Solving for Two Vector Questions

  • Thread starter Thread starter STEMucator
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Vector
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving two vector problems involving component forms and magnitudes. For the first question, participants noted that the initial answer for vector B was correct but incomplete, emphasizing the need for clarity in angle measurement and component representation. In the second question, the method was generally agreed upon, though specific numerical checks were not performed. The original poster expressed uncertainty about their notation and the angle's reference point, leading to suggestions for clearer conventions. Overall, the thread highlights the importance of precise vector representation and communication in physics problems.
STEMucator
Homework Helper
Messages
2,076
Reaction score
140

Homework Statement



I have two questions.

1. For the three vectors shown in this diagram: http://gyazo.com/9a23c78c8a52db6dde1ca52aee9cd2f0

The relationship ##\vec{A} + \vec{B} + \vec{C} = 1\hat{j}## holds. Write ##\vec{B}## in component form and then write ##\vec{B}## as a magnitude and direction.

2. The following figure shows two vectors ##\vec{A}## and ##\vec{B}##: http://gyazo.com/750754b5c6589491df5f22788e9b3281

Find a vector ##\vec{C}## such that ##\vec{A} + \vec{B} + \vec{C} = 0## and use component form to do so.

Homework Equations



##\vec{A} = \vec{A}_x + \vec{A}_y + \vec{A}_z = A_x \hat{i} + A_y \hat{j} + A_z \hat{k}##

The Attempt at a Solution



My work for part 1 and part 2 are displayed below:

Part 1: http://gyazo.com/9b03c43d7bbc1cb69ded51b9b0637b77

Part 2: http://gyazo.com/6fe9e06cfb189cd8ce6ab1c24811deec

Hopefully I've done these properly. If someone could help me verify it would be much appreciated.

Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1a. Correct, but incomplete. Use should have used the given values for the components (what you did in 1b).

1b. I agree with the magnitude. The angle, however - with respect to what is it 37 degree? Usually it is taken with respect to the x axis, but it is clearly seen from the picture that it is between 90 and 180 degrees. And the final expression you obtained does not make any sense to me at all.

2. I agree with the method. I have not checked the numbers, though.
 
Thanks for the reply voko.

voko said:
1a. Correct, but incomplete. Use should have used the given values for the components (what you did in 1b).

1b. I agree with the magnitude. The angle, however - with respect to what is it 37 degree? Usually it is taken with respect to the x axis, but it is clearly seen from the picture that it is between 90 and 180 degrees. And the final expression you obtained does not make any sense to me at all.

Question 1 was split into 2 parts, namely a) and b). For part a) I think I only had to write the component form down.

For part 1 b) though, I'm not sure I understand what I've done wrong. When I found the components for ##\vec{A}## and ##\vec{C}##, I switched everything so it would be in the first quadrant by adding a negative sign to ##C_y## (the book I'm using wants me to do this).

When I wrote my final answer, namely ##\vec{B} = 5 [-x 36.87° +y]##, I intended it to mean ##36.87°## above the negative x axis. So ##-x## is like west and ##+y## is like north.

voko said:
2. I agree with the method. I have not checked the numbers, though.

I'm sure if 1 is okay, 2 will be fine.
 
Zondrina said:
Question 1 was split into 2 parts, namely a) and b). For part a) I think I only had to write the component form down.

I believe you were supposed to write the component form not just in symbols, but in concrete numbers.

When I wrote my final answer, namely ##\vec{B} = 5 [-x 36.87° +y]##, I intended it to mean ##36.87°## above the negative x axis. So ##-x## is like west and ##+y## is like north.

This isn't a notation I am familiar with, but if that is what your textbook and you teachers understand, use it. If the angle is measured from the west, then it is OK.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
voko said:
I believe you were supposed to write the component form not just in symbols, but in concrete numbers.

This isn't a notation I am familiar with, but if that is what your textbook and you teachers understand, use it. If the angle is measured from the west, then it is OK.

This is just some self study. I'm trying to plow through phys for scientist & engineers by Randall d. Knight since I got tired of not knowing any real physics :).

I think I'll switch back to the old NESW convention as it's probably less confusing to me and any potential readers.

Thank you for your help though. Hard to tell if you're doing something properly if there's no teacher.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top