Solving for v: "Calculating the Speed of Puck After Collision

  • Thread starter Thread starter BadSkittles
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Collision Speed
AI Thread Summary
In a discussion about calculating the speed of a lighter ice puck after a perfectly elastic collision, a user initially calculated a speed of -2.09 m/s but found it incorrect. Participants suggested using distinct symbols for the masses and velocities of the pucks to clarify the equations. They emphasized the importance of rewriting the equations to avoid confusion. Additionally, it was noted that there are two potential solutions for the velocities, with one being physically impossible despite adhering to conservation laws. The conversation highlights the need for careful equation setup in collision problems.
BadSkittles
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
A 0.440kg ice puck, moving east with a speed of 3.16m/s, has a head-on collision with a 0.940kg puck initially at rest. Assuming a perfectly elastic collision, what is the speed of the lighter puck? Use east as the positive axis.

I got -2.09.

I made two equations and used substitution to find the speed of the lighter puck. But its wrong. Would appreciate all help.


initial final
1/2mv^2= 1/2 mv^2 + 1/2 mv^2

m(v) = m(v) + m(v)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How about distinguishing symbolically between the lighter and the heavier puck? Like, call the lighter m1 and the heavier m2, and same for the velocities.

Rewrite your equations that way and try again. You seem to have the right basic idea.

Hint: there are two solutions to (v1,v2). The second set is physically impossible even though not violating either momentum or energy conservation.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top