Solving for v_1, v_2, and v_3 with Nodal Analysis

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on using nodal analysis to find the voltages v_1, v_2, and v_3 in a given circuit. Initial equations are derived from Kirchhoff's Voltage Law (KVL) and Kirchhoff's Current Law (KCL), leading to a matrix representation of the system. The matrix initially indicates infinite solutions, but by eliminating the current variable, a unique solution is obtained. The final results are v_1 = 3.043 V, v_2 = -6.956 V, and v_3 = 0.6522 V. The third row of the matrix is deemed unnecessary for the solution.
VinnyCee
Messages
486
Reaction score
0
Find v_1,\,v_2,\,and\,v_3 in the circuit below using nodal analysis:

PracticeProb3-4.jpg


My work so far:

I\,=\,\frac{v_1}{2\Omega},\,\,I_1\,=\,\frac{v_2}{4\Omega},\,\,I_2\,=\,\frac{v_3}{3\Omega},\,\,I_3\,=\,\frac{v_1\,-\,v_3}{6\Omega}

KVL @ loop1 => -I\,(2\Omega)\,+\,10\,V\,+\,I_1(4\Omega)\,=\,0

Which equals:
-\left(\frac{v_1}{2\Omega}\right)(2\Omega)\,+\,10\,V\,+\,\left(\frac{v_2}{4\Omega}\right)(4\Omega)\,=\,0

Which equals:
-v_1\,+\,10\,V\,+\,v_2\,=\,0

KVL @ loop2 => -v_2\,-\,5\,I\,+\,v_3\,=\,0

KVL @ loop3 => -10\,V\,+\,v_1\,-\,v_3\,+\,5\,I\,=\,0

KCL @ v1 => I\,+\,I_3\,+\,I_4\,=\,0

KCL @ v2 => I_4\,=\,I_1\,+\,I_5

KCL @ v3 => I_2\,=\,I_5\,+\,I_3

KCL @ Super Node 1 => I_4\,+\,I_3\,=\,I_1\,+\,I_2

When I combine these equations to get 4 equations with 4 variables, I get the following matrix:

\left[\begin{array}{cccc|c}<br /> -1 &amp; 1 &amp; 0 &amp; 0 &amp; -10 \\<br /> 0 &amp; -1 &amp; 1 &amp; -5 &amp; 0 \\<br /> 1 &amp; 0 &amp; -1 &amp; 5 &amp; 10 \\<br /> \frac{1}{2} &amp; \frac{1}{4} &amp; \frac{1}{3} &amp; 0 &amp; 0<br /> \end{array}\right]

The columns go like this: v1, v2, v3, I, constant

But this matrix has infinite solutions! How do I solve?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I figured it out!

The last variable column of the matrix can be eliminated because I\,=\,\frac{v_1}{2\Omega}

This gives the matrix:

\left[\begin{array}{ccc|c}-1 &amp; 1 &amp; 0 &amp; -10 \\-\frac{5}{2} &amp; -1 &amp; 1 &amp; 0 \\ \frac{7}{2} &amp; 0 &amp; -1 &amp; 10 \\ \frac{1}{2} &amp; \frac{1}{4} &amp; \frac{1}{3} &amp; 0 \end{array}\right]

This RREF's out to:

v_1\,=\,\frac{70}{23}\,=\,3.043\,V

v_2\,=\,-\frac{160}{23}\,=\,-6.956\,V

v_3\,=\,\frac{15}{23}\,=\,0.6522\,V\,V

NOTE: The third row of the matrix is not required!
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top