Solving for x using 1 - tan(theta) in a Trigonometric Equation

  • Thread starter Thread starter James Brady
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving the equation involving trigonometric functions: (sin(45)cos(θ) - cos(45)sin(θ))/x = 1 - tan(θ). Participants suggest multiplying both sides by x to isolate x and discuss simplifying the numerator to sin(45 - θ). There is a consensus that the equation can be further simplified using trigonometric identities, particularly recognizing that tan(45 - θ) relates to the given terms. Ultimately, the solution for x is expressed in terms of cos(θ) and involves evaluating specific angles to find numerical solutions. The conversation emphasizes the importance of simplifying and correctly applying trigonometric identities in solving the equation.
James Brady
Messages
106
Reaction score
4
This problem is:

\frac{sin(45)cos(\theta) - cos(45)sin(\theta)}{x} = 1 - tan(\theta)

I've been trying to find x mostly just by multiplying things by 1-tan(theta), but so far nothing I've tried yields the numerator.

Also, sin(45)cos(\theta) - cos(45)sin(\theta) = sin(45 - \theta), it that helps...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you are to solve for 'x' why can't you just cross-multiply by 'x' and then divide by '1-tanθ '?

Do you need to simplify or something like that?
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
James Brady said:
This problem is:

\frac{sin(45)cos(\theta) - cos(45)sin(\theta)}{x} = 1 - tan(\theta)

I've been trying to find x mostly just by multiplying things by 1-tan(theta), but so far nothing I've tried yields the numerator.

Also, sin(45)cos(\theta) - cos(45)sin(\theta) = sin(45 - \theta), it that helps...
Is your goal to solve for x? To reduce confusion, that's why we ask posters to use the template and enter the complete problem description.

If you're trying to solve for x, start by multiplying both sides of the equation by x.
 
James Brady said:
This problem is:

\frac{sin(45)cos(\theta) - cos(45)sin(\theta)}{x} = 1 - tan(\theta)

I've been trying to find x mostly just by multiplying things by 1-tan(theta), but so far nothing I've tried yields the numerator.

Also, sin(45)cos(\theta) - cos(45)sin(\theta) = sin(45 - \theta), it that helps...

Note that ##\sin(45)\cos(\theta) - \cos(45)\sin(\theta) = \sin(45 - \theta)## and that ##\tan(45 - \theta) = \frac{1 - \tan\theta}{1 + \tan\theta}##.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
rock.freak667 said:
If you are to solve for 'x' why can't you just cross-multiply by 'x' and then divide by '1-tanθ '?

Do you need to simplify or something like that?

Wow, that seems really obvious to me now that you brought that up, haha. I'm having a pretty bad time doing the long division though... Check it out ->

x = \frac{sin(45)cos(\theta) - cos(45)sin(\theta)}{-tan(\theta) + 1}

I'm doing the leading terms in polynomial long division and I end up with...

\frac{-sin(45)cos(\theta)}{tan(\theta}

Ignoring the sin(45) term, I'm getting \frac{cos(\theta)}{tan(\theta)} = \frac{adjacent}{hypotenuse} * \frac{adjacent}{opposite} = \frac{adjacent^2}{hypotenuse*opposite}

The \frac{adjacent^2}{hypotenuse*opposite} term means nothing to me and doesn't really help solve. It's pretty difficult to figure this one out.
 
James Brady said:
The \frac{adjacent^2}{hypotenuse*opposite} term means nothing to me and doesn't really help solve. It's pretty difficult to figure this one out.

Which is exactly why that approach won't help you in this problem.

Take a look at Curious3141's post and see what you can do with that.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Mentallic said:
Take a look at Curious3141's post and see what you can do with that.

Oh I gotcha... because \frac{sine(x)}{cosine(x)} = tan(x)... So I can just divide by cos(45 - \theta) to end up with tan(45 - \theta) which is equal to \frac{1 - tan(\theta)}{1 + tan(\theta)}

Yeah that makes a sense, thanks everyone.
 
I am in agreement with post##4##unless i am missing something here, ...what is the ultimate aim of the problem?express ##x## as subject? ...here we have two unknown variables i.e ##θ## and ##x##, from my way of looking at it, we can also have,
##\dfrac {\cos(\theta)-\sin(\theta)}{1-\tan(\theta)}##=##\sqrt{2}####x##
 
chwala said:
I am in agreement with post##4##unless i am missing something here, ...what is the ultimate aim of the problem?express ##x## as subject? ...here we have two unknown variables i.e ##θ## and ##x##, from my way of looking at it, we can also have,
##\dfrac {\cos(\theta)-\sin(\theta)}{1-\tan(\theta)}##=##\sqrt{2}####x##

The left-hand-side can simplify.
 
  • #10
James Brady said:
Wow, that seems really obvious to me now that you brought that up, haha. I'm having a pretty bad time doing the long division though... Check it out ->

x = \frac{sin(45)cos(\theta) - cos(45)sin(\theta)}{-tan(\theta) + 1}

I'm doing the leading terms in polynomial long division and I end up with...

\frac{-sin(45)cos(\theta)}{tan(\theta}

Ignoring the sin(45) term, I'm getting \frac{cos(\theta)}{tan(\theta)} = \frac{adjacent}{hypotenuse} * \frac{adjacent}{opposite} = \frac{adjacent^2}{hypotenuse*opposite}

The \frac{adjacent^2}{hypotenuse*opposite} term means nothing to me and doesn't really help solve. It's pretty difficult to figure this one out.
If you're are working strictly in a right angled triangle and have assumed one of the angles to be 45 degrees, your ##theta## will get equal to 45 degrees, making you adjacent = opposite.

So, ##\frac{\cos \theta }{\tan \theta} = \frac{adjacent^2 }{hypotenuse \times opposite} ##
And that would simplify to:
$$
\frac{\cos \theta }{\tan \theta}= \frac{adjacent}{hypotenuse} = \cos \theta = \frac{opposite}{hypotenuse} = \sin \theta$$

[Oh my Lord! What I have written for so long.]

But believe me, it's not something we should really try to make sense.
 
  • #11
Hall said:
If you're are working strictly in a right angled triangle and have assumed one of the angles to be 45 degrees, your ##theta## will get equal to 45 degrees, making you adjacent = opposite.

There is nothing that forces one to make this assumption about \theta.

It seems to me that the problem in the OP could be the result of a calculation, possibly arising from a rotation of axes by 45 degrees.

If one solves for x in the OP and plots it on desmos, the answer will be revealed... but one should get it by hand.

I think the result by @chwala is the most efficient approach.
There's just one more step.
 
  • Like
Likes SammyS
  • #12
robphy said:
There is nothing that forces one to make this assumption about \theta.

It seems to me that the problem in the OP could be the result of a calculation, possibly arising from a rotation of axes by 45 degrees.

If one solves for x in the OP and plots it on desmos, the answer will be revealed... but one should get it by hand.

I think the result by @chwala is the most efficient approach.
There's just one more step.
Which step is that? I do not seem to see it...

also i would desist from going to old posts unless necessary...this should be my last post on any old posts...i have been told to avoid that...my apologies...
 
  • #13
chwala said:
Which step is that? I do not seem to see it...

From (\cos(\theta)-\sin(\theta)), factor out \cos(\theta).
 
  • #14
ok from,
##\dfrac {\cos(\theta)-\sin(\theta)}{1-\tan(\theta)}##=##\sqrt{2}####x##
##\cos(\theta)##×##\dfrac {\cos(\theta)-\sin(\theta)}{\cos(\theta)-\sin(\theta)}##=##\sqrt{2}####x##
⇒##\cos(\theta)##=##\sqrt{2}####x## therefore
##x##=##\dfrac {\cos(\theta)}{\sqrt{2}}##...
now solving this gives us; When ##\theta=0, x=0.707 ## this satisfies our original problem in post ##1##
 
Last edited:
Back
Top