Solving Gaussian Problem: Cylindrical Shells w/ Radii R1 & R2

  • Thread starter Thread starter Katsmed23
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gaussian
Katsmed23
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A thin cylindrical shell of radius R1 = 5.0 cm is surrounded by a second cylindrical shell of radius R2 = 9.0 cm, as in the figure. Both cylinders are 5.8 m long and the inner one carries a total charge of Q1 = +4.2 µC and the outer one carries a total charge of Q2 = -2.4 µC. (Assume the positive direction is away from the axis.)

a) r = 1.5 cm
N/C

(b) r = 5.5 cm
N/C

(c) r = 11.5 cm
N/C


Homework Equations



E *Da = Qenclosed/Epsilon

point charge = 1/4pi epsilon * Q/r^2


The Attempt at a Solution



a) radius is smaller than the radius of the first shell, so it's EF = 0
b) I've tried using E = Q / 4pi *epsilon *r^2, but i keep getting the wrong answer = 12.4e6 N/C
c) I think I should add the charges together (-2.4 + 4.2 = 2uC) and use the above equation, but I am at a loss.

I keep trying to find the answers to these last 2, but can't seem to get it right.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
do you need to find the E-field at the given r's, at the midplane of the cylinders?
 
"For points far from the ends of the cylinders, determine the electric field at the following radial distances from the central axis."

yes sorry forgot to include that!
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top