Solving Gauss's Law Problem for Electric Field

  • Thread starter Thread starter PhysicsinCalifornia
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gauss's law Law
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a Gauss's Law problem involving a charged ball and a hollow metal shell. The user is attempting to find the electric field in different regions defined by the radii of the charged objects. They express confusion about how to eliminate the volume charge density in their calculations and seek clarification on the expected format of the answers. Additionally, they provide their findings for the electric potential in various regions and request assistance in sharing their graphs depicting the relationship between electric field and distance from the center. The thread emphasizes the importance of expressing answers in terms of the given variables and sharing visual aids for better understanding.
PhysicsinCalifornia
Messages
58
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A uniformly charged ball of radius a and a total charge -Q is at the center of a hollow metal shell with inner radius b and outer radius c. The hollow sphere has a net charge +2Q. Find the magnitude of the electric field in the regions: r_1 < a,a < r_2 < b,b < r_3 < c, and r_4 > c.

Homework Equations



V = \frac{4}{3} \pi R^3
S = 4 \pi R^2
\oint E(x)dA = \frac{q_{in}}{\epsilon_o}

The Attempt at a Solution



For E(r1 < a):
\rho = \frac{Q_{tot}}{\epsilon_o}
Q_{in,tot} = \rho*\frac{4}{3} \pi r_1^3
\oint_0^rE(x)dA = \frac{q_{in}}{\epsilon_o}

E(r_1) = \frac{\rho\frac{4}{3} \pi r_1^3}{\epsilon*4 \pi r_1^2}

E(r_1) = \frac{\rho*r_1}{3\epsilon_o}

This is actually where I am stuck, I got everything else. Am I supposed to get rid of that volume charge density, \rho?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes; in textbook problems, they expect you to express the answer in terms of the variables given in the statement of the problem.

The density is uniform and you know the total charge in the little ball. So just divide that by its volume to find its density.
 
The following may help.

Regards,

Nacer.

http://islam.moved.in/tmp/c.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
There is actually a second and third part to this question:

b) Find potentials at points in the regions: r_1 &lt; a, a &lt; r_2 &lt; b, b &lt; r_3 &lt; c, and r_4 &gt;c

For r1 < a,
I use the formula

V_o - V_{r_1} = \int_0^r E(r_1)dr

E(r_1) = \frac{\rho*r_1}{3\epsilon_o}

V_o - V_{r_1} = \frac{\rho}{3\epsilon_o} \int_0^r r dr

V_o - V_{r_1} = \frac{\rho*r_1^2}{6\epsilon_o}

Solving the same way, I got::

V_o - V_{r_2} = \frac{Q}{4 \pi \epsilon_o r_2}

V_o - V_{r_3} = 0

V_o - V_{r_4} = \frac{-Q}{4 \pi \epsilon_o r_4}

Did anyone get the same answer as I did?

Also, I am supposed to sketch the graphs of how Ex depends on a distance(r) from the center of the sphere, and how V depends on a distance(r) from the center of the sphere.

I drew my graphs, but I don't know how to post it on. I don't have a scanner handy, so if anyone can help, please let me know what your graphs looks like.
Thank you very much, you are all so helpful.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top