Solving Helmholtz Equation in a Hollow Cylinder

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on solving the Helmholtz equation in a hollow cylinder with specific boundary conditions. The approach involves separating variables, leading to three distinct problems, with three Bessel equations emerging from the process. The general solution incorporates Bessel functions, but the challenge lies in applying the boundary conditions effectively. Utilizing the orthogonality property of Bessel functions allows for determining coefficients in the general solution. Ultimately, solving for these coefficients and applying the boundary conditions will yield the complete solution for the Helmholtz equation in the specified geometry.
JohanL
Messages
154
Reaction score
0
Im trying to solve Helmholtz equation

<br /> \nabla ^2u(r,\phi,z) + k^2u(r,\phi,z) = 0 <br />

in a hollow cylinder with length L and a < r < b
and the boundary conditions:

<br /> u(a,\phi,z) = F(\phi,z)<br />
<br /> u(b,\phi,z) = G(\phi,z) <br />
<br /> u(r,\phi,0) = P(\phi,z) <br />
<br /> u(r,\phi,L) = Q(\phi,z)<br />
<br /> u(r,\phi,z) = u(r,\phi + 2\pi,z)<br />

Solution:

With
<br /> u(r,\phi,z) = v_1(r,\phi,z) + v_2(r,\phi,z) + v_3(r,\phi,z) <br />

i get three problems which i can solve separately.
Separation of variables gives 9 d.e. Three of them are bessel equations.

<br /> r\frac {d} {dr}(r\frac {dR_i(r)} {dr}) + (\mu_i^2r^2-m_i^2)R_i(r) = 0<br />

i = 1,2,3. and \mu, m are separation constants.

The boundary conditions are

<br /> R_1(a,\phi,z) = F(\phi,z),<br /> R_1(b,\phi,z) = G(\phi,z)<br />

<br /> R_2(a,\phi,z) = 0,<br /> R_2(b,\phi,z) = 0<br />

<br /> R_3(a,\phi,z) = 0,<br /> R_3(b,\phi,z) = 0<br />


The general solutions of Bessels equation are

<br /> R = C_1 J_m(nr) + C_2 N_m(nr)<br />

where J_m is the mth bessel function of the first kind and N_m is the mth neumann function (or bessel function of the second kind)

I don't know how to continue with the boundary conditions.
Any ideas?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There are some theorems which under certain conditions allow you expand any function (namely the functions which appear as boundary conditions) in terms of Bessel functions.Note that these functions are not orthonormal polynomials (so no Hilbert space here),but that still doesn't prevent this from happening.

So i suggest you read more on the Bessel functions.Gray & Matthews wrote a monography.And there are tons of other useful books.

Daniel.
 


Firstly, it is important to note that the Helmholtz equation is a second-order partial differential equation, and therefore, three boundary conditions are needed for a unique solution. In this case, we have four boundary conditions, but the periodic boundary condition u(r,\phi,z) = u(r,\phi+2\pi,z) can be incorporated into the general solution, as it is already satisfied by the Bessel functions.

To continue with the boundary conditions, we can use the orthogonality property of Bessel functions. This property states that for any two different values of m, the integral of J_m(nr)N_m(nr)rdr from 0 to b will be equal to zero. Therefore, we can use this property to find the coefficients C_1 and C_2 in the general solution, by equating the integrals of the Bessel functions multiplied by the given boundary conditions to zero. This will give us a system of equations that can be solved to find the coefficients.

Once we have the coefficients, we can substitute them back into the general solution to get the complete solution for each of the three functions v_1, v_2, and v_3. Then, by adding them together, we will have the solution for u(r,\phi,z).

Finally, we can use the boundary conditions at z=0 and z=L to find the constants in the general solution for the third variable, z. This will give us the complete solution for the Helmholtz equation in the hollow cylinder.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top