Solving Inequalities with Exponential Functions

  • Thread starter Thread starter verty
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inequality
AI Thread Summary
To solve the inequality x + 3^x < 4, it is important to recognize that the function is monotone increasing, indicating it intersects y=4 at only one point, x_1. The equation x + 3^x = 4 can be approached graphically to find the intersection point, which is approximately x_1 = 1. For more precise calculations, Newton's method can be employed to approximate the solution, starting from the graph's intersection. While closed-form solutions for equations like a^x + x = b are generally not possible, in this case, the exact solution is confirmed to be x = 1. Understanding these methods provides clarity on solving such inequalities effectively.
verty
Homework Helper
Messages
2,190
Reaction score
198
I'm wondering how to solve an inequality like this:

x + 3^x < 4

I can see that it is the sum of the identity function and an exponential function. I can see that it is monotone increasing because each of those is. I therefore know that it crosses y=4 at only one x-value (call it x_1) and I know the solution will be x < x_1.

So I need to solve for x in x + 3^x = 4, how would I do that? I see I could draw the graph and read off the value, which I can see is x_1 = 1, but is there a way to calculate it?

Thank you for any clarification.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
verty said:
x + 3^x < 4

Try this: x+3^x=4+k for k&gt;0.
 
Draw a graph first, let the function be y = x + 3^x - 4 and find where this graph cuts the x-axis (That will satisfy the Ineq, Find an approximate area where the graph cuts the axis, so accuracy is paramount.). From here you should have an idea of the kind of answer you'll need. To find a approximate solution, I'd use Newton's method which is:
x_n+1 = x_n - F(x_n)/F'(x_n)
You can take the first value of x_n from the graph you've drawn.
 
Last edited:
Thank you for suggesting Newton's method.
 
In general, you can't solve equations like a^x+x=b in a closed form, although you can approximate the solution to any degree of accuracy. However in this case, it's easy to check that the solution is exactly x=1.
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
5K
Back
Top