Solving Inequality: -∞ < a < -3 ∨ -1 < a < ∞

  • Thread starter Thread starter andreask
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inequality
andreask
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi

I'm trying to solve this inequality

|1/(2+a)| < 1.

1/(2+a) < 1 ∨ 1/(2+a) > -1

1 < 2+a
a > -1

and

1 > -2-a
3 > -a
a > -3

I know that the boundaries are
-∞ < a < -3 ∨ -1 < a < ∞

What have I done wrong?

thanks in advance
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
|1/(2+a)|-1<0, result of adding -1 to both sides.Examine two conditions separately. The case, 2+a>=0, and the case, 2+a<0. Follow each solution process separately.

I can't think in advance if they will be conjoint or disjoint, but you'll find out once both conditions are solved.

Be aware, the expression 2+a must not be allowed equal to zero, meaning a<>-2;
so -2 is a critical value.
 
andreask said:
Hi

I'm trying to solve this inequality

|1/(2+a)| < 1.

1/(2+a) < 1 ∨ 1/(2+a) > -1
The connector above should be ∧ ("and") rather than "or".

If |x| < b, then an equivalent inequality is -b < x < b. This is what you should have done here.
andreask said:
1 < 2+a
When you multiply both sides by 2 + a, are you multiplying by a positive number or a negative number? It makes a difference as regards the inequality symbol.
andreask said:
a > -1

and

1 > -2-a
3 > -a
a > -3

I know that the boundaries are
-∞ < a < -3 ∨ -1 < a < ∞

What have I done wrong?

thanks in advance
 
The case with the negative sign should read 1/(2+a) < -1. Take absolute value on both sides is equivalent to changing sign on both sides, which requires reversing the inequality direction.
 
For an alternate approach
<br /> \begin{align*}<br /> -1 &amp; &lt; \frac 1 {2+a} &lt; 1 \\<br /> -(2+a)^2 &amp; &lt; (2+a) &lt; (2+a)^2 \\<br /> -a^2 - 4a - 4 &amp; &lt; 2+a &lt; a^2 + 4a + 4 \\<br /> -a^2 - 5a - 6 &amp; &lt; 0 &lt; a^2 + 3a + 2 \\<br /> -\left(a^2 + 5a + 6\right) &lt; 0 &lt; a^2 + 3a + 2 \\<br /> -(a+3)(a+2) &lt; 0 &lt; (a+1) (a+2)<br /> \end{align*}<br />
Solve the right inequality, solve the left inequality. The solution is the intersection of the two parts.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top