Solving Integration Help: ∫(9+16x2)3/2dx

  • Thread starter Thread starter ThomasMagnus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integration
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves the integration of the expression ∫(9+16x²)^(3/2)dx, which falls under the subject area of calculus, specifically integration techniques.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts various methods including trigonometric substitutions and integration by parts but expresses uncertainty about their effectiveness. They also mention trying a u-substitution with u=√(9+16x²) without success. Other participants suggest using trigonometric identities and provide insights into integrating sec^5(x), while some express concerns about the complexity of the integration by parts approach.

Discussion Status

Participants are exploring different methods for solving the integral, with some suggesting trigonometric and hyperbolic substitutions. There is a recognition of the challenges involved, particularly with integration by parts, and some participants are sharing their thoughts on alternative approaches without reaching a consensus.

Contextual Notes

One participant notes a lack of familiarity with hyperbolic functions due to curriculum constraints, which may influence their approach to the problem. Additionally, there are references to specific integration techniques and reduction formulas that are being discussed in the context of this problem.

ThomasMagnus
Messages
138
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



∫(9+16x2)3/2dx

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I have tried to solve this one in various ways. At first, I tried using trig substitutions and then integration by parts. I attached a pdf of what I tried to do. I'm unsure as to what I am doing wrong. Is there something I am missing here? I tried to do a u substitution with u=√9+16x2 but that seemed to not work either. Other ways just get me bogged down in a very long integration by parts thing. Is there any other way? Can anyone shed some light on what I can do to solve this? Thanks!
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
It seems like trig substitutions are the way to go. I looked at it quickly, and if you can integrate [itex]sec^{5}(\theta)[/itex], you can solve the problem
 
That's what I kept getting to. However, it seemed like it was going to take many integration by parts. I guess there is no other option. Any advice on how to integrate sec^5 (x). I saw somewhere else to write it as
cos (x) / cos^6 (x)
 
You can do it by parts, it is ugly though.

Let d(sec) = sec(x) tan(x) dx
So int sec tan^2 dx = int tan d(sec)

I'll use this to make the structure easier to see.

sec^5 = sec (1 + tan^2)^2
= sec + 2 sec tan^2 + sec tan^4

int sec^5 dx = int sec dx + 2 int tan d(sec) + int tan^3 d(sec)


Start with the most difficult term and work your way down.

int tan^3 d(sec) = sec tan^3 - int sec 3 tan^2 sec^2 dx
= sec tan^3 - 3 int sec^3 tan^2 dx
= sec tan^3 - 3 int sec tan^2 (1 + tan^2) dx
= sec tan^3 - 3 int tan d(sec) - 3 int tan^3 d(sec)

This should give you enough confidence to continue in this direction and get the answer.
 
I think it's a little easier substituting sinh instead of tan. You get cosh4, which you can then handle by expanding as a sum of exponentials.
 
haruspex said:
I think it's a little easier substituting sinh instead of tan. You get cosh4, which you can then handle by expanding as a sum of exponentials.

Thing is, I have never learned about hyperbolic sines or cosines. In Calc 1 we were told to omit them, and haven't gone over them in Calc II. Although I hate doing this, I'm trying to do it by remembering the reduction formula for secant^m(x). Every time I do it by parts I seem to get lost in 2 pages of integrals.

I think it's sec^m(x)=sinxsec^(m-1)/(m-1) + (m-2)/(m-1)int sec^(m-2) dx
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K