Solving Integration Problem: Int 0-2 (1+9x^4)^1/2 dx

  • Thread starter Thread starter BoldKnight399
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integration
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around evaluating the integral from 0 to 2 of the expression (1 + 9x^4)^(1/2) dx, which falls under the subject area of calculus, specifically integration techniques.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the use of trigonometric substitution as a method to simplify the integral. There are questions regarding the handling of the x^4 term, with some participants expressing confusion about the appropriate substitutions and transformations needed for integration.

Discussion Status

Several participants have shared their approaches, including specific substitutions and transformations. There is an ongoing exploration of how to correctly apply trigonometric identities and substitutions, with some participants seeking clarification on the steps involved. No consensus has been reached, but productive dialogue is occurring.

Contextual Notes

Participants are grappling with the implications of using a trigonometric substitution for a term involving x^4, which adds complexity to the problem. There is also a mention of a right triangle setup to assist in the substitution process, indicating a need for clarity on geometric interpretations.

BoldKnight399
Messages
78
Reaction score
0
integral from 0 to 2 of (1+9x^4)^1/2 dx

I was thinking that I could use a trig substitution to solve for it so it would be:
[2]\int[/0] [9(1/9 +x^4)]^1/2
so [2]\int[/0]3[(1/9+x^4)]^1/2

my problem is that I can understand that my a would b 1/3, and that it should be atantheta, but what I can't seem to get is that it is an X^4. I understand that it is (x^2)^2, but again, how do I do it because I only know how to deal with it when it is x^2. If anyone has any suggestions how to deal with this problem, that would be great.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ok here goes nothing
i start out by x=1/(sqrt(3))tan(u) dx=1/sqrt(3)sec(u)^2
so then w have 1/(sqrt3)*sqrt(1+tan(u)^4)*sec(u)^2du
then i am using the formula for reducing powers for tan(u)^2
which is tan(u)^2=(1-cos(2u))/(1+cos(2u)) then substituting
this in for tan^2 and then foiling this
and then getting a common denominator with the one inside the radical and combining like terms to give me
sqrt(2+2cos(2x)/(1+2cos(2x)+cos(2x)^2)
then i factor the top and bottom
can u see how it factors 2(1+u)/(u+1)^2 u=cos(2x)
leaving us with 2/(cos(2x)+1) which if you notice this is the inverse of the formula for reducing powers for cos^2) so this is sec^2(u) so this simplifies beautifully to
sqrt(sec^2)(sec^2)1/(sqrt(3)
which becomes sec^3(u) so we then integrate sec^3 which we know how to do
which becomes 1/2(secu)tan(u)+1/2ln|secu+tanu| and our 1/sqrt(3) out front
then from our original substitution x=1/sqrt(3)tanu we simply draw our little triangle
and find the sec and tan of it and back substitute . i hope this is right ,
 
Last edited:
wait...how did you get a cube root?
 
It's not a cube root -- sqrt(3) is the square root of 3. I think that's what you're referring to.
 
I am still lost though as to how you got that. And why is it 1 over that?
 
I think what cragar did was to use a trig substitution. I'll let him/her jump back in and correct me if the details aren't right.

Draw a right triangle with one acute angle labelled u. The opposite side is 3x^2 and the adjacent side is 1. The hypotenuse is sqrt(1 + 9x^4). From this triangle, tan u = 3x^2, so x = sqrt(tan u)/sqrt(3). Also, sec^2(u)du = 6x dx. With these relationships you can rewrite the original integral so that it is in terms of u and du.
 
ok, that makes sense but how do you plug it back it? Do you plug it back in so that the 3x^2 is substituted by tanu, or is just the x substituted by tan^(1/2)/root3? Thats where I understood that it should have been a trig sub, but I didn't know how to do it with a x^4
 
You substitute based on the the relations I gave in post #6, that are based on the right triangle I described. You can get everything from that.
 
oh, ok. I get it now, Thank you
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
11K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
17K