Solving Kinematics: Finding Release Height Above Window

  • Thread starter Thread starter rjs123
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Kinematic
AI Thread Summary
A water balloon takes 0.22 seconds to cross a 130 cm high window, and the problem is to determine the height from which it was dropped. The initial attempt calculated the velocity incorrectly by using average speed instead of accounting for acceleration due to gravity. The correct approach involves solving for the initial velocity using kinematic equations. After re-evaluating the calculations, the correct height above the window was found to be 0.48 meters. The discussion highlights the importance of using appropriate kinematic equations in solving motion problems.
rjs123
Messages
90
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement




A water balloon takes .22 s to cross the 130 cm high window, from what height above the top of the window was it dropped?



The Attempt at a Solution



I'm using:

v^2 = vo^2 + 2a(x - xo)

v = distance/time
v = 1.30 m / .22 s = 5.91 m/s

(5.91 m/s)^2 = 0 + 2(9.8 m/s^2)(x)
x = 1.78 m from release to bottom of window

1.78 m - 1.3 m = distance of release from top of window

.48 m


I'm doing something wrong since the available answers aren't .48m...and it is something simple.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can't simply use distance divided by time to get the velocity at the bottom of the window, as the balloon is being accelerated due to the earth. What other equation could you apply?
 
Pi-Bond said:
You can't simply use distance divided by time to get the velocity at the bottom of the window, as the balloon is being accelerated due to the earth. What other equation could you apply?

nevermind i got it.
 
Last edited:
Right, you can solve for v0 from that equation, and use that to obtain the distance above the top of the window the ball was thrown from.
 
Pi-Bond said:
Right, you can solve for v0 from that equation, and use that to obtain the distance above the top of the window the ball was thrown from.

yeah i see what i did...thanks.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top