Solving Kinetic Theory Homework: Work Done By External Agent

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a kinetic theory homework problem involving an insulated cylinder with ideal gas and an external agent shifting a piston. Participants calculate the internal energy change and work done, emphasizing the importance of determining final temperatures and the number of moles. The calculations yield a work done of W = 2PV(√2/√3 + √2 - 2), which conflicts with a textbook answer of W = 2.5PV(√2/√3 + √2 - 2). The conversation highlights a potential error in the textbook's solution, with participants agreeing on the derived formula based on the principles of adiabatic processes. The resolution suggests that the textbook answer may be incorrect based on the calculations presented.
zorro
Messages
1,378
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The figure shows the initial state of the gas in an insulated cylinder. The gas is ideal and it is given that, Cp/Cv = 1.5. The insulated piston by the help of an external agent is slowly shifted to the right such that the piston divides the cylinder in the ratio 1 : 3. Calculate the work done by the external agent.

The Attempt at a Solution



I calculated the final temperatures
T1 = √2/√3 T and T2 = √2T

Increase in internal energy of the entire system of gas ,
U = (n1+n2)Cv(T1 + T2 -2T)
Cv = 2R
U = 2RT(n1 + n2)(√2/√3 + √2 - 2)

(n1 + n2)RT=2PV
therefore U=4PV(√2/√3 + √2 - 2)
The answer is U=2.5PV(√2/√3 + √2 - 2)

Please help
 

Attachments

  • 0higu5bh.jpg
    0higu5bh.jpg
    4.8 KB · Views: 449
Physics news on Phys.org
You will have to explain how you are getting the temperatures. Show all your work, including how you get W from \Delta U

AM
 
Sure. I skipped that to save time.
Let V1 and V2 be the final volumes of the left and right parts resp.
V1=3V2 and V1 + V2 = 2Vo
Hence V1 = 3Vo/2 and V2 = Vo/2

As the process is adiabatic,
For the left part, TV\gamma-1 is constant
Using this equation, T1 = √2/√3 T
Similarly applying the same equation for the right part,
T2 = √2T.

Work will be done by the gas at the expense of its own internal energy ( there is no heat exchange )
W = -\DeltaU
But work is done on the system hence it is -W
W = \DeltaU
 
you're right its an adiabatic process so the change in internal energy is equal to the work done. So if you have the change in U of the first chamber, and the change in U of the second chamber, it should be easy for you to find the work done.

If you have all the initial temperatures and all of the final temperatures then you have done 90% of the problem. U(T) = 3/2 * nRT
 
you're right its an adiabatic process so the change in internal energy is equal to the work done. So if you have the change in U of the first chamber, and the change in U of the second chamber, it should be easy for you to find the work done.

If you have all the initial temperatures and all of the final temperatures then you have done 90% of the problem. U(T) = 3/2 * nRT

I already got the concept behind the question.
My problem is that my answer doesnot match with the given answer.
 
I calculated n1 + n2 as follows-
the number of moles present in the final condition in both the parts are equal to the no. of moles present in each part initially.
so n1 = n2 = PV/RT
n1 + n2 = 2PV/RT

Substituting this in the equation,
U = 2RT(n1 + n2)(√2/√3 + √2 - 2),
U= 2RT x 2PV/RT (√2/√3 + √2 - 2) = 4PV(√2/√3 + √2 - 2).

Is there any mistake in calculation of number of moles?
 
Abdul Quadeer said:
Increase in internal energy of the entire system of gas ,
U = (n1+n2)Cv(T1 + T2 -2T)
The above part of your analysis is not correct:

W = \Delta U = n_1C_v\Delta T_1 + n_2C_v\Delta T_2 = n_1C_v(T_1 -T) + n_2C_v(T_2 - T) \ne (n_1 + n_2)C_v(T_1 + T_2 - 2T)

If n1 = n2, you will be out by a factor of 2. Are they equal?

AM
 
Last edited:
Abdul Quadeer said:
I calculated n1 + n2 as follows-
the number of moles present in the final condition in both the parts are equal to the no. of moles present in each part initially.
so n1 = n2 = PV/RT
n1 + n2 = 2PV/RT

Substituting this in the equation,
U = 2RT(n1 + n2)(√2/√3 + √2 - 2),
U= 2RT x 2PV/RT (√2/√3 + √2 - 2) = 4PV(√2/√3 + √2 - 2).

Is there any mistake in calculation of number of moles?

You should use:

\Delta U = nC_v\Delta T

You should get:

W = \Delta U = nC_v\left(\frac{\sqrt{2}}{\sqrt{3}} + \sqrt{2} - 2\right) T

where n is the number of moles in one side of the cylinder. Determine what C_v is in terms of R and \gamma and use that value. AM
 
Last edited:
Andrew Mason said:
You should use:

\Delta U = nC_v\Delta T

You should get:

W = \Delta U = nC_v\left(\frac{\sqrt{2}}{\sqrt{3}} + \sqrt{2} - 2\right) T

where n is the number of moles in one side of the cylinder. Determine what C_v is in terms of R and \gamma and use that value.


AM

I proceed as you told -
n = PV/RT
Cv = R/\gamma-1 = R/1.5-1 = 2R

W = nCv T(√2/√3 + √2 - 2) = PV/RT x 2R x T(√2/√3 + √2 - 2) =2PV (√2/√3 + √2 - 2)

The answer given in my book is W = 2.5PV (√2/√3 + √2 - 2)
 
  • #10
Abdul Quadeer said:
I proceed as you told -
n = PV/RT
Cv = R/\gamma-1 = R/1.5-1 = 2R

W = nCv T(√2/√3 + √2 - 2) = PV/RT x 2R x T(√2/√3 + √2 - 2) =2PV (√2/√3 + √2 - 2)

The answer given in my book is W = 2.5PV (√2/√3 + √2 - 2)
I get the same as you. So I would say that the book answer is wrong.

The answer in terms of gamma is:

W = nC_v(\Delta T_1 + \Delta T_2) = n(\frac{R}{\gamma-1})T(\frac{\sqrt{2}}{\sqrt{3}} + \sqrt{2} -2) = \frac{nR}{\gamma-1}(\frac{PV}{nR})\left(\frac{\sqrt{2}}{\sqrt{3}} + \sqrt{2} -2\right)= \frac{PV}{\gamma-1}\left(\frac{\sqrt{2}}{\sqrt{3}} + \sqrt{2} -2\right)

AM
 
Last edited:
  • #11
Alright.
Thanks
 
Back
Top