Solving Laplace Transform: Finding \frac{1}{{\left( {s + 4} \right)^2 }}

tony873004
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
1,753
Reaction score
143
From the class notes:
\begin{array}{l}<br /> y&#039;&#039; + 8y&#039; + 16y = te^{ - 4t} ,\,\,\,\,\,y\left( 0 \right) = y&#039;\left( 0 \right) = 0 \\ <br /> \\ <br /> L\left[ {y&#039;&#039;} \right] + 8L\left[ {y&#039;} \right] + 16L\left[ y \right] = \frac{1}{{\left( {s + 4} \right)^2 }} \\ <br /> \end{array}

How did he get \frac{1}{{\left( {s + 4} \right)^2 }} ?
From the table, t = \frac{1}{{s^2 }} and e^{at} \to \frac{1}{{s - a}}
How do these combine to give \frac{1}{{\left( {s + 4} \right)^2 }} ?

The next line is
s^2 y\left( s \right) - sy\left( 0 \right) - y&#039;\left( 0 \right) + 8\left( {sy\left( s \right) - y\left( 0 \right) + 16y\left( s \right)} \right) = \frac{1}{{\left( {s + 4} \right)^2 }}

Where did everything on the left side of = come from? The table doesn’t have y’’ or y’.

After this, the problem looks like it turns into algebra.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Tony

The laplace transform of a product is not just the Laplace transform of the components, have a look at this table:
http://www.efunda.com/math/laplace_transform/forward.cfm?FuncName=Basic
shows:
L(e^{-\alpha t}) = \frac{1}{{\left( {s + 4} \right)^2 }}
to get the relation you actually need to perform the integral


the next line comes about from the Laplace transform rules for derivatives, see this table
http://www.vibrationdata.com/Laplace.htm
these can be derived using integration by parts on successive derivatives if i remember rightly...
 
Thanks. The 6th entry in the 1st table you linked to has the right side of my equation. It was missing from the table I had from class notes. And thanks for the 2nd table. I think it explains it.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top