Solving Moving Crests Problem: Acceleration Zero @ .75m

  • Thread starter Thread starter imranq
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves determining the point at which the acceleration of a crest on a vibrating string is zero. The context suggests a relationship to wave motion, specifically relating to sine curves and oscillations on a string of a specified length.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the nature of the wave, questioning whether it is a progressive wave or a stationary wave. There is also consideration of the implications of having two periods and the definition of a crest in this context.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different interpretations of the problem. Some have offered insights into the nature of wave motion and the implications of acceleration at a crest, while others express uncertainty about the wording and assumptions of the question.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of potential ambiguity in the problem statement, particularly regarding the definition of a crest and whether it pertains to a stationary or progressive wave. Participants note the lack of clarity in the question's wording, which may affect their understanding and approaches.

imranq
Messages
57
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


A crest is created on a string by vibrating it. The crests have two periods on the string which is 3 m long. At what point will the crest have an acceleration of zero?

I had gotten this problem from a science competition and really had no idea how to do it. But I assumed that the vibrations would make a sine curve and the place where acceleration is zero would be where [tex]\frac {d^{2}}{dx^{2}} \sin {x} = 0[/tex]

Thereby I calculated an answer of .75m, but could someone clarify this for me?

Homework Statement

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


.75m
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I can't see that there is a sensible answer to this question. The 'crest' of a wave usually moves forward at a steady velocity. This implies no acceleration. Perhaps the question refers to a stationary wave. The crest then never moves!
How a crest has two periods does not make sense to me either. Does this mean there are two crest on the string (stationary wave) or one crest takes two time periods to traverse the string(progressive wave)
Alternatively you could consider the acceleration back to the equilibrium position ie from the crest down to the mid line. But a crest is the point of max acceleration by definition.
 
I think when they mention 'crest' they mean to imagine a very small amount of string that is moving in a crest and that obviously accelerates and decelerates depending on how the crest is created. That was my logic, or else I couldn't solve it.
 
Ok If we concentrate on one piece of the string then it is in simple harmonic motion.

The equation for this is a=-Amplitude*(2*pi*freq.)^2*sin[(2*pi*freq.)t]
a= acceleration
amplitude = max distance moved from mid point
freq= number of oscillations per second

But this does not seem to get a solution any closer. There are too many unknowns.

I'm still unclear as to whether they mean a standing wave like the vibration of a guitar string or a progressive wave that moves along the string.

Have you got the precise wording of the question correct?
 
Its hazy right now, maybe the question had a different wording, but I can't check right now
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K