Solving Multiple Integrals: Hints for Proving Identity

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving an identity involving multiple integrals of scalar functions and their gradients over a defined region and its boundary. The context is set within vector calculus, specifically focusing on the application of the product rule and the divergence theorem.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the use of the product rule in vector calculus and its application to the problem at hand. There are mentions of relevant identities and the divergence theorem as potential tools for approaching the proof.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered hints regarding the use of the product rule and the divergence theorem, indicating a productive direction for the original poster. However, there is no explicit consensus on the exact steps to take, and the discussion remains open-ended.

Contextual Notes

There is an acknowledgment of the forum's focus on guiding understanding rather than providing direct solutions, which influences how participants engage with the problem. The original poster expresses uncertainty about the initial suggestions and the relevance of the divergence theorem.

Benny
Messages
577
Reaction score
0
Hi, I posted a question some time ago and the suggestion was to use some form of the product rule but I still can't figure out what to do.

Q. Let f(x,y,z) and g(x,y,z) be C^2 scalar functions. Let D be an elementary region in space and [tex]\partial D[/tex] be the closed surface that bounds D. Prove that

[tex]\int\limits_{}^{} {\int\limits_{}^{} {\int\limits_D^{} {\nabla f \bullet \nabla g} dV = \int\limits_{}^{} {\int\limits_{\partial D}^{} {f\nabla g \bullet dS} - \int\limits_{}^{} {\int\limits_{}^{} {\int\limits_D^{} {f\nabla ^2 gdV} } } } } }[/tex]

Can someone give me a hint as to where to start, like any relevant identies which could be of use? Any help is appreciated thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The following identity should help:

[tex]\nabla \cdot (f \vec A) = \vec A \cdot \nabla f + f \nabla \cdot \vec A[/tex]

Which is just one of the 3D versions of the product rule. (You can substitute [itex] \nabla g[/itex] into this formula)
 
Thanks for the help, I'll try to finish this one off.

Edit: Hmm...I could've sworn that your post made mention of the divergence theorem before...nevermind, I'll keep that in mind.;)
 
Last edited:
Yea, sorry about that. I had originally told you how to do the problem step by step, but I realized that's not what this forum is for, so I changed it. But yes, the divergence theorem is necessary.
 
Oh ok, it doesn't really matter too much now. The divergence theorem is the only connection I know of between surface and volume integrals so I probably would've used it eventually anyway.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
11K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K