Solving Newton's Laws: Get Help Here!

asi123
Messages
254
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



In the attach

Homework Equations



Newton Laws

The Attempt at a Solution



Ok, I did the first one, came up with T2 = 8.736, is that right?
What is the net force?
How do I do the third one?

10x in advance.
 

Attachments

  • 1.jpg
    1.jpg
    20.6 KB · Views: 376
Physics news on Phys.org
asi123 said:
Ok, I did the first one, came up with T2 = 8.736, is that right?
What is the net force?
How do I do the third one?

Shalom asi123! :smile:

Yes, your T2 is right! :smile:

The net force is the vector sum of all the forces.

(By Newton's second law, it will be equal to mass times acceleration.)

Just add all the forces (obviously, the vertical components cancel, so you only have to add the horizontal components :wink:)

The use the formula for centripetal acceleration to find the speed. :smile:
 
tiny-tim said:
Shalom asi123! :smile:

Yes, your T2 is right! :smile:

The net force is the vector sum of all the forces.

(By Newton's second law, it will be equal to mass times acceleration.)

Just add all the forces (obviously, the vertical components cancel, so you only have to add the horizontal components :wink:)

The use the formula for centripetal acceleration to find the speed. :smile:

Shalom Shalom.
10x.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top