Solving Orbital Plane Alignment of Two Planets

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the orbital plane alignment of two planets orbiting the Sun, considering their interactions with each other and the Sun. The original poster suggests that the planets' orbital planes will eventually align due to potential energy minimization, but doubts remain about the feasibility of this alignment without external forces. Participants note that while many celestial bodies in the solar system are co-planar, this is often due to their formation processes rather than dynamic interactions. They highlight that the damping effect in such systems is not straightforward, as the n-body problem is time-reversible, meaning co-planarity could be disrupted. Ultimately, the consensus leans towards the idea that while alignment is possible, it is unlikely without specific conditions or forces at play.
chronnox
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Im trying to solve (approximately) the following problem: Suppose that i have 2 planets with mass m1 and m2 orbiting around the sun and i take into account the following interactions:
a) Interaction between planet 1 and the sun
b) Interaction between planet 2 and the sun
c) Interaction between planet 1 and planet 2

Where the sun has mas M >> m1,m2 . My physical intuition tells me that this system is similar to a damped harmonical oscillator so at later times the orbital planes of the planets will be aligned, i.e., the angle between the orbital planes will be zero at later times. The problem is that i can't find a book or an article which can help me with this. Does anyone know a good book to start with? or a book with a method to solve this problem?. Finally do you agree with my proposal that the angle between the orbital planes will be zero at later times?.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
i'm not so sure the alignment will happen. Where does the damping come from?
 
It's nice idea. It is not the damping force, i think just potential energy between the 2 planets will get the lowest value when they are aligned.
 
Assuming that their orbits are far enough apart that their orbits are stable, their nodes will precess, but they will never become co-planar unless some other force is at work.

One way to think about it is that point mass n-body problems are time reversable. So if they did become co-planar, it would imply that a perfectly co-planar system could also break free of its co-planar state.

We observe a lot of systems that are roughly co-planar in our solar system. The planets around the Sun all orbit within < 20 degrees. The inner moons of Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune are roughly co-planar, but they probably formed that way.

Mars has two moons that are roughly co-planar even though they may be captured asteroids. This does imply that there are forces that will make objects co-planar. In this case, I believe it is the tides they raise on Mars, and Mars's equatorial buldge that makes their orbits settle into equatorial orbits. So the moons didn't do it to each other. Mars' non-spherical shape caused them to both become equatorial orbiters.

But the Sun takes 30 days to spin once. It has practically no equatorial buldge. And even if it did, the planets are sufficiently far from the Sun that it could be accurately approximated as a point mass, and the planets would never feel a significant pull from this buldge. Additionally, the planets are too far to pull a significant tide on the surface of the Sun.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top