Solving Parametric Equations: Cartesian Equations from Parametric Equations

  • Thread starter Thread starter Michael_Light
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Parametric
AI Thread Summary
To convert the given parametric equations into Cartesian form, the key step is to eliminate the parameter 't'. This can be achieved by solving one of the equations for 't' and substituting it into the other equation. The discussion highlights the importance of recognizing that the Cartesian form may involve relationships beyond a simple y=f(x) format, potentially requiring a more complex function. Additionally, the use of logarithmic transformations and hyperbolic functions is suggested for handling the equations effectively. Ultimately, the goal is to express the relationships between x and y without the parameter 't'.
Michael_Light
Messages
112
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I have [PLAIN]http://img543.imageshack.us/img543/1608/msp481619fbgebbd2f2fg34.gif and [PLAIN]http://img153.imageshack.us/img153/121/msp69719fbh6if8c7b729c0.gif as my parametric equations with ''t'' as parameter. How to find its Cartesian equation?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I know i have to eliminate the ''t'', but i have no ideas how to eliminate it. Can anyone help me? Thanks...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Solve for 't' in the first equation, and plug it in the second. Basically you have to eliminate 't'
 
That fact that they say Cartesian makes me think that this is not just a y=f(x) question but a f(x,y) parametrized as f(t). Michael, is there more to the question that you posted?

Or is it just a case of finding t in terms of some f(x) and then replacing all of the t's in the y=g(t) to get y=f(g(x))?
 
Graph it on a graphing calculator. Nice Graph !

Let u = ln(t) for t > 0 → t = eu. (Take care of t < 0 later.)

The results for x&y should include cosh(u) & sinh(u) respectively.
 
Last edited:
Multiply the numerators & denominators of both expressions by 1/t.

x(t)=\frac{2at(1/t)}{3(t^2+1)(1/t)}=\frac{2a}{3(t+\frac{1}{t})}

y(t)=\frac{-2bt(1/t)}{3(t^2-1)(1/t)}=\frac{-2b}{3(t-\frac{1}{t})}

Therefore, x(1/t) = x(t) and y(1/t) = -y(t)
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Back
Top