Solving Planetesimal Accretion: How Long Does It Take?

  • Thread starter Thread starter spinnaker
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Accretion
spinnaker
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
Kinda stumped. The question gives three equations and I don't know what to do with them, because given the equations there's always more than one unknown. Any assistance/tips would be appreciated!

If a planetesimal has a cross-sectional area of πR2 (where R is the planetesimal's radius) and is sweeping through a cloud of smaller particles of fixed size with a velocity V, the number of collisions per second will be:

dn/dt = (πR2N)/m

where ρN=the space density (kg/m3) of particles in the cloud and m=the mass of each particle.

If each collision results in the target particles sticking to the planetesimal, the planetesimal will gain mass at a rate of

dM/dt = πR2N

where M=the planetesimal mass.

The time to grow to radius R is

t = (4R/V)/(ρPN)

where ρP=the density of the planetesimal itself. (Assume that ρN and V stay constant as particles are swept up.)

Assuming that a reasonable value for the density of accretable material in inner part of the early solar nebula is ρN = 10-7 kg/m3, estimate the time to accrete a body of 1,000 km radius. Assume a reasonable ρP.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Don't see your problem.
You are given an equation t=... and you know all the variables.
 
That was a duplicate post. Solved in the other thread in Introductory Physics.

ehild
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top