Solving precalc problem without calculator

bfpri
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
The terminal side of an angle theta in standard position passes through (-2,-3). What is sec theta?

How would you solve this problem without a calculator?

Thanks.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
One approach to start with is draw this angle on a cartesian coordinate system, maybe including in the form of a triangle; you may need to express something using pythagorean theorem. Remember that 1/(cosine) = secant.
 
you could set up a triangle having (0,0) as one vertex, (-2, -3) as another and (-2, 0) as the third. What are the lengths of the three sides? What is sec of the angle at the origin (which is what you must mean by "theta"- you didn't specify what "theta" was!). Remember that these are "signed" lengths. Distances measured downward or to the left are negative.

Even simpler would be to use the "circular" definition of sine and cosine: Draw a unit circle. Starting at (1, 0) measure around the circumference a distance t. The coordinates of the end point are, by definition, (cos t, sin t). Now, (-2, -3) does not lie on the unit circle but it is easy to find a point on that line that does (use "similar triangles"). What is the x coordinate of that point? What is 1/cosine?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top