Solving Problem 6c: Time Taken from A to B and B to C

  • Thread starter Thread starter chwala
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Time
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving Problem 6c, which involves calculating the time taken for a swimmer to travel from point A to B and then from B to C in a moving river. Participants emphasize the importance of considering the swimmer's speed in still water versus the speed in the current. The correct time calculation, derived from the vertical component of velocity, is confirmed to be approximately 23 seconds using the formula \( t = \frac{\Delta y}{v_y} \) where \( v_y \) accounts for the sine of the angle of the swimmer's trajectory.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of resultant velocity in fluid dynamics
  • Knowledge of trigonometric functions, specifically sine
  • Familiarity with basic kinematics equations
  • Concept of swimmer's speed in still water versus moving water
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of trigonometric functions in physics problems
  • Learn about fluid dynamics and its impact on motion
  • Explore kinematic equations for different motion scenarios
  • Investigate the effects of current on swimming speed in various conditions
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on kinematics and fluid dynamics, as well as educators teaching these concepts in a practical context.

chwala
Gold Member
Messages
2,827
Reaction score
415
Homework Statement
see attached.
Relevant Equations
Relative Velocity
My interest is only on Example 6; part c only, see the problem below and the solution from textbook.

1637907448203.png


is the time calculated correctly? I thought we need to use the approach shown below; my thoughts, but of course i may be missing something here, The time taken from points ##A## to ##B## is the same as the time taken from point ##B## to ##C##, i used the thinking of resultant distance divide by resultant velocity.

1637907705360.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
chwala said:
is the time calculated correctly?
The time shown in Ex. 6 looks fine to me.

chwala said:
I thought we need to use the approach shown below; my thoughts, but of course i may be missing something here,
Your approach doesn't seem to be correct. The major difference between your work and the work shown in the example is that you don't seem to be taking into account the swimmer's speed in still water vs. the swimmer's speed in the moving river. The worked example does take this difference into account.

chwala said:
The time taken from points A to B is the same as the time taken from point B to C, i used the thinking of resultant distance divide by resultant velocity.
Again, you are not taking into account that the water in the river is moving, and in so doing is making the swimmer's speed greater than it would be if he were swimming in a lake (where the water is not moving).
 
Mark44 said:
The time shown in Ex. 6 looks fine to me.

Your approach doesn't seem to be correct. The major difference between your work and the work shown in the example is that you don't seem to be taking into account the swimmer's speed in still water vs. the swimmer's speed in the moving river. The worked example does take this difference into account.

Again, you are not taking into account that the water in the river is moving, and in so doing is making the swimmer's speed greater than it would be if he were swimming in a lake (where the water is not moving).
I considered the speeds in still water and moving water, ...that's how we ended up with resultant velocity being equal to ##1.32##m/s. You can see that i attempted to use it on my last part of my working i.e in finding;
##time##= ##\frac {distance}{resultant velocity}##.

On a different note, I can see that the resultant velocity was broken down into the two components, maybe the only thing that i need to understand is why they divided by sine...of course a quick guess is that sine takes into account the perpendiculor distance of the river bank (i.e the 20m).
 
Last edited:
Aaaargh Mark. I nailed it man!

On looking at the same problem, i was able to use a different approach to realize the desired result. That is;
1637912559623.png

I understand my approach better. One just needs to find the distance ##BC## as indicated on my sketch diagram. Bingo guys:cool:
 
Last edited:
The easiest approach for the time is to note that the vertical (on the diagram) component of velocity comes only from the swimmer's velocity in still water. Since the vertical distance is 20 m, the time is
$$t = \frac{\Delta y}{v_y} = \frac{20.0~\rm m}{(1~{\rm m/s})\sin 60^\circ} = 23~\rm s.$$
 
vela said:
The easiest approach for the time is to note that the vertical (on the diagram) component of velocity comes only from the swimmer's velocity in still water. Since the vertical distance is 20 m, the time is
$$t = \frac{\Delta y}{v_y} = \frac{20.0~\rm m}{(1~{\rm m/s})\sin 60^\circ} = 23~\rm s.$$
I get it now...thanks...you made it clear, thanks to you and Mark, what i can see is that we may use the right angle triangle for the swimmer's velocity in still water i.e in using the right angle triangle and trig. concepts knowledge we get,

##t##= ##\frac {20}{1 × sin 60}## = ##\frac {20}{ 1.32 ×sin 41} = 23.09## seconds ≈ ## 23## seconds
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
31
Views
3K