Solving Problem 6c: Time Taken from A to B and B to C

  • Thread starter Thread starter chwala
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Time
chwala
Gold Member
Messages
2,826
Reaction score
414
Homework Statement
see attached.
Relevant Equations
Relative Velocity
My interest is only on Example 6; part c only, see the problem below and the solution from textbook.

1637907448203.png


is the time calculated correctly? I thought we need to use the approach shown below; my thoughts, but of course i may be missing something here, The time taken from points ##A## to ##B## is the same as the time taken from point ##B## to ##C##, i used the thinking of resultant distance divide by resultant velocity.

1637907705360.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
chwala said:
is the time calculated correctly?
The time shown in Ex. 6 looks fine to me.

chwala said:
I thought we need to use the approach shown below; my thoughts, but of course i may be missing something here,
Your approach doesn't seem to be correct. The major difference between your work and the work shown in the example is that you don't seem to be taking into account the swimmer's speed in still water vs. the swimmer's speed in the moving river. The worked example does take this difference into account.

chwala said:
The time taken from points A to B is the same as the time taken from point B to C, i used the thinking of resultant distance divide by resultant velocity.
Again, you are not taking into account that the water in the river is moving, and in so doing is making the swimmer's speed greater than it would be if he were swimming in a lake (where the water is not moving).
 
Mark44 said:
The time shown in Ex. 6 looks fine to me.

Your approach doesn't seem to be correct. The major difference between your work and the work shown in the example is that you don't seem to be taking into account the swimmer's speed in still water vs. the swimmer's speed in the moving river. The worked example does take this difference into account.

Again, you are not taking into account that the water in the river is moving, and in so doing is making the swimmer's speed greater than it would be if he were swimming in a lake (where the water is not moving).
I considered the speeds in still water and moving water, ...that's how we ended up with resultant velocity being equal to ##1.32##m/s. You can see that i attempted to use it on my last part of my working i.e in finding;
##time##= ##\frac {distance}{resultant velocity}##.

On a different note, I can see that the resultant velocity was broken down into the two components, maybe the only thing that i need to understand is why they divided by sine...of course a quick guess is that sine takes into account the perpendiculor distance of the river bank (i.e the 20m).
 
Last edited:
Aaaargh Mark. I nailed it man!

On looking at the same problem, i was able to use a different approach to realize the desired result. That is;
1637912559623.png

I understand my approach better. One just needs to find the distance ##BC## as indicated on my sketch diagram. Bingo guys:cool:
 
Last edited:
The easiest approach for the time is to note that the vertical (on the diagram) component of velocity comes only from the swimmer's velocity in still water. Since the vertical distance is 20 m, the time is
$$t = \frac{\Delta y}{v_y} = \frac{20.0~\rm m}{(1~{\rm m/s})\sin 60^\circ} = 23~\rm s.$$
 
vela said:
The easiest approach for the time is to note that the vertical (on the diagram) component of velocity comes only from the swimmer's velocity in still water. Since the vertical distance is 20 m, the time is
$$t = \frac{\Delta y}{v_y} = \frac{20.0~\rm m}{(1~{\rm m/s})\sin 60^\circ} = 23~\rm s.$$
I get it now...thanks...you made it clear, thanks to you and Mark, what i can see is that we may use the right angle triangle for the swimmer's velocity in still water i.e in using the right angle triangle and trig. concepts knowledge we get,

##t##= ##\frac {20}{1 × sin 60}## = ##\frac {20}{ 1.32 ×sin 41} = 23.09## seconds ≈ ## 23## seconds
 
Last edited:
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top