Solving Relativistic Momentum Problem: Pion Decays into Photons

mewmew
Messages
113
Reaction score
0
I am having trouble with getting the right answer for this problem that is pretty simple and it is driving me insane.

You start out with a pion that decays into 2 photons that split at an angle theta in opposite directions from the original pion.

The velocity v of the pion is 2.977*10^8 m/s, with a mass m of 135 MeV.

If E is the pions energy and E1 and E2 are the photons energy then we have:
<br /> E=E1+E2=\gamma*m*v<br />
With E1=E1/c, E2=E2/c

and so for momentum we have(P1-P2)Sin[\theta]=0 so we get P1=P2 so E1=E2

So we can write 2(P1+P2)Cos[\theta]=Ppion

Now we can write 2E/C*Cos[\theta]=\gamma*m*v

Which reduces to Cos[\theta]=\gamma*m*v*c/2E but this does not give me the correct angle :( The correct angle should be 6.79 degrees for each photon but as you can see from my equation since v=2.977 I get Cos[\theta]=1/2(about), can anyone find my problem before I go insane? Thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
E=m\gamma, not mv\gamma.
Just write p/E=v/c=(2k\cos\theta)/(2k).
 
Thanks, the book does it similar to how you solve it, but I like to be able to solve things in a way that I will remember on a test just in case I can't find the easy way. Thanks, I figured it was something stupid like that.
 
Last edited:
The easy way is easier to remember. Physics is finding the easy way.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top