Solving Riemann Sum: Velocity Function v(t) = t^2 -5t + 6

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves analyzing the velocity function v(t) = t^2 - 5t + 6 for a particle moving along a line, specifically focusing on finding the displacement and distance traveled during the time interval [0,5].

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the distinction between displacement and distance, with some suggesting that the integral of velocity gives displacement while the integral of speed (absolute value of velocity) gives distance. Others question the implications of the velocity function's sign changes within the interval.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different interpretations of the velocity function and its implications for displacement and distance. Some guidance has been offered regarding the need for a fine enough sum to account for sign changes in velocity, but there is no explicit consensus on the conclusions drawn.

Contextual Notes

There are conflicting views on the displacement being zero and the relevance of the turning point of the velocity function. Participants are examining the effects of negative and positive velocity on the overall displacement and distance.

MillerL7
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
The velocity function is v(t)=t^2 -5t + 6 for a particle moving along a line. Find the displacement traveled by the particle during the time interval [0,5].

What is the displacement?
What is the distance traveled?

I think that the information should look like this:
(1)(1^2 -5(1) +6)+(2)(1^2-5(2)+6)+(3)(1^2-5(3)+6)+(4)(1^2-5(4)+6)+(5)(1^2-5(5)+6) to get the distance..., but I am unsure about it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What you did was to find the displacement, which is the integral of velocity. The distance is the integral of speed, the absolute value of velocity.

v(t)=(t-2)(t-3) suggests that v does flip sign twice across that interval, so as long as you use a sum fine enough to have points in the interval (2,3) included in your sum, then displacement and speed should be unequal (since the velocity is negative in that interval).
 
uhh the velocity function is just a simple parabola and has a single turning point on [0,5]. The difference between distance and displacement in this question is that while the distance is the integral, the displacement is in fact 0.

if you have a negative velocity for some time and then a positive velocity for the same time you end up in the same place.
 
exk said:
uhh the velocity function is just a simple parabola and has a single turning point on [0,5]. The difference between distance and displacement in this question is that while the distance is the integral, the displacement is in fact 0.

if you have a negative velocity for some time and then a positive velocity for the same time you end up in the same place.

The turning point is not relevant. What is relevant is that the velocity is negative between t= 2 and t= 3, positive velocity from 0 to 2 and from 3 to 5. You do NOT have "a negative velocity for some time and then a positive velocity for the same time" and the displacement is NOT 0.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K