Solving Rolling Disk Homework: Find V, ω, KE Rot & Trans

AI Thread Summary
A solid uniform disk of radius 0.250 m and mass 55.0 kg rolls down a 15-degree incline, starting from rest. The discussion focuses on calculating the linear speed, angular speed, and kinetic energies of the disk at the bottom of the ramp. Key equations include V = ωR and the relationship between potential energy and kinetic energy, leading to the derived formula Vcm² = 4gh/3. The participants clarify the derivation of acceleration and angular acceleration, confirming that height is not needed in the final calculations. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the relationships between linear and angular motion in solving the problem.
nopistons93
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A solid uniform disk of radius 0.250 m and mass 55.0 kg rolls down an incline that makes an angle of 15 degrees with the horizontal. The disk starts from rest from the top of the ramp. Find the speed of the disk's center of mass when it reaches the bottom of the ramp(linear speed), its angular speed omega at that point and its KE rotational and KE translational energies.


Homework Equations


V(linear) = omega*R
\alpha=R*\omega2
v=R*\omega
a=R*\alpha

PE = KErotational + KEtranslational

I = 1/2mr2

The Attempt at a Solution



I solved for I and got 1.72 kg * m^2 however without height or length I can't solve for the PE side inorder to get the KE.

I've seen the equation \alpha=2gsin\Theta/3R and that's the only thing I've noticed that would allow me to solve for either V or \omega in this case. Am I missing something here, some equation which relates another way to this problem?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


ok so deriving the formula a = g*sin(theta)/1.5 , I found out that a = 1.69 m/s^2

since alpha = a/r , I found alpha to be 6.76 m/s^2.

since alpha=r*omega^s , i found omega to be 5.20 m/s again.

Solving for v from (v=r*omega), I found v equal to 1.30 m/s

i then plugged these numbers into the KE formulas to solve for them. Does that sound right?
 


nopistons93 said:
I've seen the equation \alpha=2gsin\Theta/3R and that's the only thing I've noticed that would allow me to solve for either V or \omega in this case. Am I missing something here, some equation which relates another way to this problem?

This equations is actually easily derived. Just start working out the problem assuming you do have h (height), use PE = KE. You will end up with Vcm^2 = \frac{4gh}{3}. You then need to remember the equation V^2 = Vi^2 + 2ad. Since Vi = 0, you will be able to plug in that equation for V^2 and get the equation you mentioned (noticed that h (height) cancels out, so it is not needed)
 


im not understanding whre the Vcm^2 = 4gh/3 is coming from though..
 


all right well you start out with mgh = 1/2 I(omega)^2 + 1/2 1/2 mv^2. I = 1/2mr^2 as you said. omega = v/r. After a little algebra you should arrive at Vcm^2 = 4gh/3
 


ok exactly what I was looking for there man. thank you very much\
 


hey crypto,

im at the point..

2*a*d*sin(theta)=4gh/3

that reduces to a = 2g/3sin(theta) for some reason..
 


that's right, it's pretty much the same equation as you wrote, divide both sides by r (radius), and you will get \alpha = \frac{2gsin(\theta)}{3R}
 


well my equation yields 25.42 while the correct one yields 1.69
 
  • #10


you mean for a (acceleration)? didn't you get 1.69 a couple posts back?
 
  • #11


Yes, just putting radius in the formula gives you alpha. I do understand I think I'm just writing down my algebra wrong.
 
Back
Top