Solving Schroedinger Equation for a Step Potential

FishareFriend
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Undergraduate Quantum Mechanics problem. However the course hasn't gone as far to include R or T so I'm assuming there must be a way to solve this without needing to know about those.

Homework Statement



Asked to show that \psi(x)=A\sin(kx-\phi_0) is a solution to the 1D-time-independent Schroedinger Equation for x<0.
Then asked to show that the general solution for x>0 is \psi(x)=Be^{{-x}/{\eta}}+Ce^{{x}/{\eta}}.
Question then is, by considering how the wave function must behave at x=0, show that \phi_0=arctan(\eta k)

Homework Equations



\psi(x)=A\sin(kx-\phi_0)\quad x<0
\psi(x)=Be^{{-x}/{\eta}}+Ce^{{x}/{\eta}}\quad x>0
\phi_0=arctan(\eta k)\quad x=0

The Attempt at a Solution


I've tried various ways, attempting to put the first solution into exponential form, then attempting to put the second solution into trigonometric form. Neither of these seem to give the desired result, I just end up with i everywhere. I also can't see how you get \eta k out.
Feel like I'm missing a step or something in order to be able to solve this, any help would be greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
FishareFriend said:
Question then is, by considering how the wave function must behave at x=0,
So how does the wave function behave at x=0?
 
And as x goes to +∞?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top