Solving Series ODE: Finding x(0) w/ Problem Statement

mathman44
Messages
204
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement

The Attempt at a Solution



I did the "show that" part. But what is throwing me off is the x(0)=0 part. What is "x" a function of? Using the series in the square brackets,

I found that when
n=0, a_1 = a_0 ^2
n=1, a_2 = (a_1 * a_0)/2
n=2, a_3 = (a_0*a_2 + a_1^2 + a_2*a_0)/3

So it would seem that a_3 is still zero because all the terms it is a function of are also zero (or, at least, should be). I'm not confident about this... where did I go wrong?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Whether they mean that x(y=0) = 0 or it's a typo and should have been y(x=0)=0, both give the same results. You use the initial condition to show that a0=0. There's no reason to set x=0 in the recursion relations.
 
mathman44 said:

Homework Statement


2emooz7.jpg

The Attempt at a Solution



I did the "show that" part. But what is throwing me off is the x(0)=0 part. What is "x" a function of? Using the series in the square brackets,

I found that when
n=0, a_1 = a_0 ^2
n=1, a_2 = (a_1 * a_0)/2
n=2, a_3 = (a_0*a_2 + a_1^2 + a_2*a_0)/3

So it would seem that a_3 is still zero because all the terms it is a function of are also zero (or, at least, should be). I'm not confident about this... where did I go wrong?

Check your a2, I get a2=a1a0 but that isn't your main problem. For n = 2 you are looking at the coefficient of x2 on the left side. Don't forget there is a -x2 term outside of the sum.

As far as the x(0) = 0 thing, I would bet it is a typo and means y(0) = 0.
 
Hey phil, I'm pretty sure a3=1/3, and the next nonzero coefficient is a7=1/63, didn't look for the next, I think it's a11=2/2079 though. (we're working together). (btw your a3 equation should be (3a3-a12-2a0a2)x2-x2=0, so the coefficient of the first x2 isn't suppose to be zero.)
 
Last edited:
Thanks for the help, I got it ;)
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top