Solving Simple Harmonic Problem 2: Acceleration-Displacement Equation Help

  • Thread starter Thread starter thunderhadron
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Harmonic
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the acceleration-displacement equation for a simple harmonic motion problem. The user attempts to differentiate the potential energy function to find the force, leading to an expression for acceleration. They correctly note that for small oscillations, the cubic term can be neglected, simplifying the equation to acceleration = - (2a/m).x. Despite this, there is confusion regarding the book's answer, which the user believes is incorrect. The consensus suggests that the user has arrived at the correct solution, indicating a potential error in the textbook.
thunderhadron
Messages
140
Reaction score
0
Hi friends the problem is -

https://fbcdn-sphotos-d-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-prn1/30370_2656498989013_1471109032_n.jpg

Attempt -

friends as per the question I am trying to get the acceleration- displacement equation for this problem. So I am using

F = - (dU / dx)
Differentiating Potential energy function w.r.t. x I get,

F = - (2a + 4b .x3)

But F = mass. acceleration so,

acceleration = - (2a/m + 4b/m x3)

Now I am sticking here that how to proceed further to get the result like,

acceleration = - ω2 . x

Please friends help me in solving this Problem.

Thank you all in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Check to make sure that you took the derivative of ax2 correctly. Also keep in mind that you are considering "small" oscillations.
 
TSny said:
Check to make sure that you took the derivative of ax2 correctly. Also keep in mind that you are considering "small" oscillations.

F = - (dU / dx)
Differentiating Potential energy function w.r.t. x I get,

F = - (2ax + 4b .x3)

But F = mass. acceleration so,

acceleration = - (2a/m.x + 4b/m x3)

It is for small oscillations so x3 will be neglected.

Hence accn = -(2a/m).x

acceleration = - ω2 . x

hence The answer comes, ω = √(2a/m)

Yet the answer is not achieved. In the book the answer is option (B)
 
I think you got the right answer. I don't see how (B) could be the answer.
 
TSny said:
I think you got the right answer. I don't see how (B) could be the answer.

Yes there is mistake in the answer of book.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top