Solving Solid Disk Rolling Up Incline: Find Height h

AI Thread Summary
A solid disk of mass m and radius R rolls up an incline without slipping, and the goal is to determine the height h it reaches based on its initial velocity v. The kinetic energy of the disk is converted to potential energy as it ascends, leading to the equation 0.5Iω² + mv² = mgh. After substituting the moment of inertia and relating linear and angular velocities, the final expression for height is derived as h = (5/4)(v²)/g. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding the relationship between linear velocity v and angular velocity ω in this context. The final answer indicates that the disk rolls up to a height proportional to the square of its initial velocity.
NathanLeduc1
Messages
36
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A solid disk of mass m and radius R rolls without slipping with a velocity v. Assuming it doesn't slip, how far vertically will it roll up an incline?

Homework Equations


I=0.5mr2
E=0.5Iω2
KE=0.5mv2
PE=mgh

The Attempt at a Solution


I'm thinking that we need to find the height h when the kinetic energy is converted to potential energy. So:
0.5Iω2+mv2=mgh
0.5*0.5mr2ω2+mv2=mgh
0.25r2ω2+v2=gh
h=(0.25r2ω2+v2)/g
Is that right? I feel weird because I still have ω in there.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
NathanLeduc1 said:

Homework Statement


A solid disk of mass m and radius R rolls without slipping with a velocity v. Assuming it doesn't slip, how far vertically will it roll up an incline?

Homework Equations


I=0.5mr2
E=0.5Iω2
KE=0.5mv2
PE=mgh

The Attempt at a Solution


I'm thinking that we need to find the height h when the kinetic energy is converted to potential energy. So:
0.5Iω2+mv2=mgh
0.5*0.5mr2ω2+mv2=mgh
0.25r2ω2+v2=gh
h=(0.25r2ω2+v2)/g
Is that right? I feel weird because I still have ω in there.
What's the relationship between v and ω ?
 
Ah, either you're a genius or I'm dumb. Probably both. Thank you.

I got a final answer of (1.2*v^2)/g = h.
 
Oops, 1.25... ((5/4)(v^2))/g = h
 
NathanLeduc1 said:
Ah, either you're a genius or I'm dumb. Probably both. Thank you.
Probably neither.

I considered a lengthier reply to your Original Post, but then though I'd see what you could do with a fairly subtle hint/question. From that, you completed the exercise. I commend you for that.

You might be surprised at how many people need to be led by the nose, step-by-step to an answer.

I got a final answer of (1.2*v^2)/g = h.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top