Solving Static Equilibrum Homework: Can a Man Reach the Top?

  • Thread starter Thread starter abramsay
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Static
abramsay
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
I need an assessment on the homework before I submit it.

Homework Statement



A Ladder of length L and negligible mass leans again a vertical wall, making an angle θ with the horizontal. A work man of mass M climbs the ladder a distance x from the bottom along the length of the ladder. Assuming the wall is completely frictionless, but the ground possesses a coefficient of static friction µ,
(a ) how far up the ladder can the man climb before it slips along the ground?
(b) Is it possible for the man to climb to the top of the ladder without slippage occurring?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Let N1, N2 and Fs be the normal reaction from the wall, the ground and the frictional force respectively.
ƩFx=Fs+(-N1)= 0 ⇒Fs=N1
ƩFy=N2+(-Mg)= 0 ⇒N2=Mg
Taking moment about B,
Ʃԏ=N1(Lsinθ)+(-MgLcosθ)x/L=0
N1Lsinθ=xMgcosθ
N1= xMgcosθ/Lsinθ
⇒Fs=xMgcosθ/Lsinθ= µ_s N2
µ_s=Fs/N2= xMgcosθ/MgLsinθ=xcosθ/Lsinθ
Let y be the fraction of the ladder the man climbs before slipping occurs
Fs=N1 and N2=Mg
N1Lsinθ-MgyLcosθ=0
N1= MgyLcosθ/Lsinθ
But Fs= µ_s N2
xcosθMg/Lsinθ=MgyLcosθ/Lsinθ
y=x/L
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your analysis is correct so far. Is there a question you wish to ask?
 
kuruman said:
Your analysis is correct so far. Is there a question you wish to ask?

Ok.

The second part:
(b) Is it possible for the man to climb to the top of the ladder without slippage occurring?
Do you think I have to show that with my workings or say it in a statement.
 
abramsay said:
Ok.

The second part:
(b) Is it possible for the man to climb to the top of the ladder without slippage occurring?
Do you think I have to show that with my workings or say it in a statement.
Both. Use your equations to find what the minimum coefficient of static friction ought to be so that the ladder does not slip no matter how far up the ladder the man climbs.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top