Solving Static Friction: 3 kg Block & 99 N/m Spring

  • Thread starter Thread starter glasshut137
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Friction Springs
AI Thread Summary
A 3 kg block collides with a massless spring (99 N/m) at a speed of 1.5 m/s. The spring compresses 26.11 cm, and the coefficient of static friction between the block and the floor is 0.703416. The discussion revolves around whether the block remains at rest or bounces back after full compression of the spring. It is suggested that the block likely remains at rest due to the static friction force being greater than the spring force. Participants encourage verifying this by comparing the forces involved.
glasshut137
Messages
23
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A 3 kg block collides with a massless spring of spring constant 99 N/m attached to a wall. The speed of the block was observed to be 1.5 m/s at the moment of collision.

(3 of 3) Given: the coefficient of static friction between the floor and the block is .703416. Does the block remain at rest or does it bounce back off of the spring once the spring is fully compressed?


The Attempt at a Solution



I already solved the first 2 parts of the question, i found that the spring will compress 26.11 cm. Also, I found that the coefficient of kinetic friction is .467 if the maximum distance to which the spring is compressed is 15.667 cm.

My guess is that the block would remain at rest because it would would a larger force to break through the force of static friction. Can someone tell me if I'm right or wrong and can please explain? thanks so much.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well you can computer the force of the spring and the static friction and check if the force that the spring exerts is indeed too small.
This shouldn't be hard since you correctly answered 1&2 and computed the compression of the spring
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top