Solving the 2D Laplace Equationd Approach

Uku
Messages
79
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



u_{tt}=u_{xx}


The Attempt at a Solution


Where do I start? I have this wonderful Schaums outline at hand, and by looking at similar (unfortunately unsolved problems) I can guess that the answer will be in the range of:

u=F(x+iy)+G(x-iy)

I'm saying something in that range (solution of the 2D Laplace equation), but not exactly.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hoi! It is 2am and I was rushing things a bit. I have yet another book which has the solution for the 2D Laplace equation. So in my case I just have to take

1-\lambda^{2}

Instead of

1+\lambda^{2}

as presented in the Laplace equation solution?
I'm assuming here that the procedure of solving the Laplace equation is known to the reader. Sorry for that.

Regards,
Uku
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top