Solving the Frequency of Small Oscillations in a Spherical Dish

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding the frequency of small oscillations of a marble rolling in a spherical dish using both conservation of energy and Newton’s second law. Participants are attempting to derive the expected result, w^2 = 5g/7R, but some encounter issues with their calculations. One contributor notes that they adjusted the radius in their calculations to R - b, which they believe is more accurate for a small marble. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly applying the principles of energy conservation and rotational dynamics to achieve consistent results. Ultimately, the goal is to confirm that both methods yield the same frequency for the oscillations.
S0C0M988
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
A marble of radius b rolls back and forth in a shallow spherical dish of radius R. Find the frequency of small oscillations. You can solve this problem using conservation of energy or using Newton’s second law. Solve it both ways and show that you get the same answer.

I kind of get the concept and I'm using conservation of energy but he numbers don't work out. I know the answer is supposed to be w^2 = 5g/7R

I set up PE = KE + Rotational KE but it doesn't work.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
S0C0M988 said:
A marble of radius b rolls back and forth in a shallow spherical dish of radius R. Find the frequency of small oscillations. You can solve this problem using conservation of energy or using Newton’s second law. Solve it both ways and show that you get the same answer.

I kind of get the concept and I'm using conservation of energy but he numbers don't work out. I know the answer is supposed to be w^2 = 5g/7R

I set up PE = KE + Rotational KE but it doesn't work.
It worked for me except I have R - b instead of R. Assuming a small marble. R is close enough.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top