Solving the Homeomorphism Problem Using Real Sequences and Topology Theorems

  • Thread starter Thread starter radou
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Homeomorphism
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving that the function h : Rω --> Rω, defined by h((x1, x2, ...)) = (a1x1 + b1, a2x2 + b2, ...), is a homeomorphism under the product topology. The proof utilizes a theorem from topology that states continuity of a function is determined by the continuity of its component functions. The author successfully demonstrates that h is continuous, one-to-one, and onto, confirming that h is indeed a homeomorphism from R∞ to R∞. An alternative proof for continuity is also provided, reinforcing the conclusion.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of product topology in topology.
  • Familiarity with continuity of functions and homeomorphisms.
  • Knowledge of real sequences and their properties.
  • Experience with Munkres' topology theorems.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of product topology in detail.
  • Learn about the properties of homeomorphisms in topology.
  • Explore continuity proofs using component functions.
  • Review Munkres' "Topology" for additional examples and theorems.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, particularly those studying topology, educators teaching advanced calculus or analysis, and researchers interested in real analysis and topology applications.

radou
Homework Helper
Messages
3,149
Reaction score
8

Homework Statement



Here's another problem from Munkres.

Let (a1, a2, ...) and (b1, b2, ...) be sequences of real numbers, with ai > 0, for every i. Define h : Rω --> Rω with h((x1, x2, ...)) = (a1x1 + b1, a2x2 + b2, ...). Show that if Rω is given the product topology, h is a homeomorphism.

Homework Equations



I used a theorem which states that if f : A --> ∏Xj is given by the equation f(a) = (fj(a)) (j is from some indexing set J), where fj : A --> Xj, for each j, then f is continuous if and only if fj is continuous, for each j.

I'm not sure if I can use this theorem here, since there's no information about what the set A is.

The Attempt at a Solution



First I tried to prove that h is continuous using the theorem up there.

h(x) can be represented with (h1(x), h2(x), ...), where hj(x) = aj∏j(x) + bj. Here ∏j(x) denotes the projection mapping onto the j-th coordinate of x. Since hj(x) is continuous for every j (the projection mapping is continuous, addition and multiplication are, too), we conclude that h is continuous.

Proving one to one and onto is easy:

Let h(x) = h(y), then for every j, ajxj + bj = ajyj + bj, hence xj = yj, for every j. Let c = (c1, c2, ...) be in the image set of h. Then, for every j, (cj - bj)/aj = xj, and hence (x1, x2, ...) maps to c.

The j-th component of the inverse of h is given with (hj(x) - bj)/aj, and the inverse is continuous too, since it's continuous for every index j.

All this is well defined, since aj > 0, for every j.

Hence, h is a homeomorphism from R∞ to R∞.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Here's an alternative proof for continuity, which seems even easier.

Let x be a point in Rω, and Uω a neighborhood of h(x). Every component of h(x) lies in a neighborhood <a, b>, i.e. a < aj xj + bj < b. It follows that <(a-bj)/aj, (b-bj)/aj> is a neighborhood of xj whose image is in <a, b>. The product of all such neighborhoods in Rω is a neighborhood of x whose image under h lies in Uω.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 100 ·
4
Replies
100
Views
13K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
7K