Solving the Kinetic Friction Problem - Bob's Dilemma

AI Thread Summary
Bob's dilemma involves determining whether a force of 100N is sufficient to move a crate weighing 800N with a coefficient of kinetic friction of 0.5. The kinetic friction force is calculated as 400N, which indicates that 100N is inadequate to overcome this friction. Even if the crate were already in motion, the applied force would not be enough to keep it moving, as it would decelerate to a stop. Additionally, static friction is typically greater than kinetic friction, meaning the force required to initiate movement would exceed 400N. Therefore, Bob cannot move the crate with the force he is applying.
brayrbob
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
I need help with this problem
Bob wants to push a crate horizontally with a force of 100N. If the coefficient of kinetic friction between the crate and the floor is 0.5 and the crate has a weight of 800 N, can he move the crate.

Okay that's the problem and I don't believe that 100N is enough force to push a crate of 800N. But even if my answer is wrong I'm not sure which equation to use to prove it.
When I take the kinetic friction of 0.5 and times it by the crate's 800N, I get 400N. Is this the way to show that 100N is not enough force to push this crate?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yep, sounds ok to me.
 
Even assuming the crate is already moving, it wouldn't be enough.
The force of kinetic friction as you showed is eqaul to the objects normal force times the coefficient of kinetic friction, whcih equals 400 N.
If the pusher only supplies 100 N, then the box will slow to a stop if it is already moving.

Generally (from everything I have seen), the static friction is always higher than the kinetic friction, so if the crate starts from rest, the pusher will have even less of a chance to move the box.
 
Okay, That answer seemed logical to me, but I wanted to be sure I was right.
Thank you all very much for your help.
 
If the problem only gives you the kinetic friction constant then, like someone mentioned above, you can say that the static friction coefficient is always larger then the kinetic friction coefficient. Therefore the 100N would not be larger then the static frictional force which is larger then 400N.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top