Solving the Slender Ladder Problem: Angular Acceleration

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the angular acceleration of a slender ladder with a mass of 10 kg released from rest, leading to a derived angular acceleration of 3.75 rad/s². Participants express frustration over the absence of this answer in a multiple-choice test, questioning whether the professor made an error. Various approaches to solving the problem are debated, including the use of torque and constraint equations, with some arguing that more equations are needed than unknowns. Confirmation of the 3.75 rad/s² result is provided, and an alternative method involving the instantaneous axis of rotation is suggested for simplification. The conversation emphasizes the complexity of the problem and the need for clarity in calculations.
eurekameh
Messages
209
Reaction score
0
2zeff2e.png

The slender ladder has a mass of 10 kg. It is released from rest in the position shown. Friction at the two contact surfaces are negligible. Determine the angular acceleration of the ladder.

I summed forces in the x,y direction, summed moments about the ladder's center of mass, wrote a kinematics equation relating the angular acceleration to the acceleration of its center of mass for a total of 5 unknowns (Force at bottom, ax, ay, angular acceleration, force at the vertical wall) and 5 equations. I have angular acceleration = 3.75 rad/s^2. This was on a multiple choice test, but there was no answer of 3.75 rad/s^2. I've been at this problem for days, making the same "mistake" over and over. I have found that the solutions manual of a similar problem is also doing the same thing I'm doing. Did my professor make a mistake?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi eurekameh! :smile:

(pleeeease don't post such wide images :redface:)

(it should be possible with just one τ = Iα equation, and one constraint equation … anyway:)

show us your full calculations, and then we'll see what went wrong, and we'll know how to help! :smile:
 
3.75 rad/s^2 is correct.
 
tiny-tim:
I don't think it's possible with just one tau = (I)(alpha) equation and one constraint equation because then you'd have too many unknowns with not enough equations.
Denoting Fx as the force from wall, and Fy as the force from floor:
For forces in x;
Fx = max
For forces in y;
Fy - mg = may
And for moments about center of mass;
(Fy)(cos60) - (Fx)(sin60) = (1/12)(m)(l^2)(alpha)
The two constraint equations gave me:
ay = -(alpha)(cos60)
ax = (alpha)(sin60)
5 unknowns in 5 equations gave me 3.75 rad/s^2.
Thanks for the confirmation, Quinzio. :)
 
hi eurekameh! :smile:
eurekameh said:
tiny-tim:
I don't think it's possible with just one tau = (I)(alpha) equation and one constraint equation because then you'd have too many unknowns with not enough equations.

yes you can if you do it τ = dL/dt about P, the point where the normals meet …

τ = dL/dt = d/dt {Ic.o.mω + mrc.o.m x vc.o.m} = Ic.o.mα + mrc.o.m x ac.o.m

give it a try! :wink:

(i don't know why i said Iα before :redface:)
 
YES, so it by instantaneous axis of rotation. search it up on google if you don't know about it. it becomes very easy
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top