Solving the Sliding Rod Equilibrium Problem on a Wall

  • Thread starter Thread starter daniel_i_l
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rod Sliding Wall
AI Thread Summary
A rod of length L and mass M leans against a frictionless wall at a 30-degree angle, prompting a discussion on the static friction required for equilibrium. The initial approach involved analyzing forces at the rod's center, breaking down gravitational force into components along and perpendicular to the rod. The calculated static friction was initially found to be Ustatic >= 0.6sqrt(3), but the correct value is Ustatic >= 0.5sqrt(3). A clearer method involves considering all forces acting on the rod, including gravity, the horizontal force from the wall, and the vertical and horizontal components of the force from the floor. The discussion emphasizes applying conditions for both translational and rotational equilibrium to solve the problem accurately.
daniel_i_l
Gold Member
Messages
864
Reaction score
0
Here's a question (not homework) that someone asked me a few days ago:
you have a rod with length L and mass M that's leaning against a frictionless wall and makes a 30deg angle with the floor. what does the static friction have to be inorder for the stick to stay inequilibrium?
What i did was to pretend that all the mass was at the center of the rod. then i split the force mg on that point into two parts - "along the rod" and perpendicular to the rod. the force along the rod pushes the bottom of the rod into the ground with and angle of 30 bellow the ground. the perp force induces a normal force which also has two parts - along the rod and perp to the rod going up. this perp force creates a torque which also pushes the bottom of the stick into the ground.
So basically i summed up all these forces and got the answer:
Ustatic >= 0.6sqrt(3)
But the real answer is
Ustatuc >= 0.5sqrt(3)
What it the correct way to deal with this problem?
Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Whether "homework" or not, all textbook/coursework-type questions should be posted in the appropriate "Homework Help" section. I'll move it. :smile:

I can't really follow what you are doing here. To solve this, just consider all the forces acting on the ladder:
(1) Gravity, which acts down through the center of mass (you started off with that)
(2) The force from the wall--since there's no friction, it acts horizontally
(3) The force from the floor--break it into two components: friction force (horizontal) and normal force (vertical)

Now just apply the conditions for translational and rotational equilibrium.
 
thanks, i got it now.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top