Solving the Transformation to Eddington-Finkelstein in Schwarzschild Geometry

Astrofiend
Messages
36
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I'm having problems seeing how the transformation to Eddington-Finkelstein in the Schwarzschild geometry works. Any help would be great!

Homework Equations



So we have the Schwarzschild Geometry given by:

<br /> ds^2 = -(1-2M/r)dt^2 + (1-2M/r)^-^1 dr^2 + r^2(d\theta^2+sin^2\theta d\phi^2) <br />

and the Edd-Fink transformation assigns

<br /> t = v - r -2Mlog\mid r/2M-1 \mid<br />

The textbook says it is straight-forward to simply sub this into the S.G line element to get the transformed geometry, but I can't seem to get it.

The Attempt at a Solution



OK, so differentiating the expression for the new t coordinates above, I get:

<br /> dt = dv - dr -2M. \frac{d}{dr} [log(r-2m)-log(2m)]<br />
<br /> dt = dv - dr -2M. \left(\frac{1}{r-2m}\right)<br />
<br /> dt = dv - dr - \left(\frac{2m}{r}-1\right)<br />


...but the book says the answer is

<br /> dt = -\frac{dr}{1-\frac{2M}{r}} + dv<br />

>where am I going wrong here? Given this last expression, it is fairly easy to sub it into the SG line element to get the transformed coordinates. Problem is, I can't seem to get that far! Any help much appreciated...
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Astrofiend said:

Homework Statement


OK, so differentiating the expression for the new t coordinates above, I get:

<br /> dt = dv - dr -2M. \frac{d}{dr} [log(r-2m)-log(2m)]<br />

Ermm... shouldn't this be

dt = dv - dr -2M. \frac{d}{dr} [log(r-2m)-log(2m)]dr

?:wink:

Also, 2m\left(\frac{1}{r-2m}\right)<br /> \neq \left(\frac{2m}{r}-1\right)
 


Damn it! Still not seeing it...
 


dt=dv-dr-2m\left(\frac{1}{r-2m}\right)dr=dv-\left[1+2m\left(\frac{1}{r-2m}\right)\right]dr

Just simplify...it's basic algebra from here.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top