Solving Trig Equations: Sin/Tan | Tutorial & Working

  • Thread starter Thread starter Rudders
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Trig
Rudders
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I'm just stumped on how to solve the following type of trig equation. Could someone show working / a tutorial on how to solve similar equations. I'm fine with simple ones like: 4 + sinx = 3 , but this style has me stumped:

sin(x + 30) = 1
or

tan(x + 45) = 1

Thanks!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Try letting u = x + 30 in the first one, or u= x+45 in the second one. Then, solve it just like you are used to and you attain your values for u. You know the relation between u and x, easy. =]

EDIT: I didn't realize this wasn't the homework forum when I posted. From now on, please only ask homework style questions in the Homework Help forum.
 
sin(x + 30) = 1

( x + 30 ) = 90

x = 90 - 30

x = 60
 
HanQing said:
sin(x + 30) = 1

( x + 30 ) = 90

x = 90 - 30

x = 60

x = 60 + 2k pi

edit: oh wait, in degrees that is:
x = 60 + 360k

Where k is any whole number.

Because sine is repetitive every 360 deg or 2pi rad.
 
ImAnEngineer said:
x = 60 + 2k pi

edit: oh wait, in degrees that is:
x = 60 + 360k

Where k is any whole number.

Because sine is repetitive every 360 deg or 2pi rad.

opps yea you are right ,forgot to include that =.=
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
6K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top