Solving Trigonometric Equations

  • Thread starter Thread starter pugfug90
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Trigonometric
AI Thread Summary
The equation 2cos²x + 3cosx = 0 can be factored to find solutions, leading to cosx(2cosx + 3) = 0. This results in two cases: cosx = 0, which gives solutions x = π/2 and 3π/2, and cosx = -3/2, which is invalid since cosine values cannot exceed 1. The discussion emphasizes that dividing by cosx is not valid when cosx could be zero, highlighting the importance of considering all potential solutions. Additionally, the graph of the function 2cos(x) + 3 indicates it does not intersect the x-axis, confirming there are no real solutions for cosx = -3/2. The final solutions for the original equation are confirmed as x = π/2 and 3π/2.
pugfug90
Messages
118
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


use the inverse functions where necessary to find all solution of the equation in the interval [0,2pi). Use a graphing utility to verify.

2cos(squared)x+3cosx=0


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



The answer is pi/2 and 3pi/2 from my teacher..
===
2cos(squared)x=-3cosx
2cosx=-3
cosx=-3/2

stuck :confused:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can solve it like any other quadratic. What would you do with 2y2 + 3y = 0 ?
 
also remember you cannot divide both side by cos x (or y in turdferguson redefinition), because cos x can be zero (and in fact it is a solution)
 
As turdferguson points out, it's not completely valid to divide both sides by cos(x). What if cos(x)=0?
 
I can factor out cosx? (sorry, this is midterm, and this stuff is what we did in January:p)

2cos(squared)x+3cosx=0
cosx(2cosx+3)=0
cosx=0 and cosx=-3/2

I can figure cosx=0 to be x=pi/2 and 3pi/2 but can anyone remind me why cosx=-3/2 doesn't work (invalid in calc)?
---
I think because adj/hyp, and adj has to be smaller than hyp, so cos or sin > 1 = no solution?
 
Yes, that's the reason.
 
No real number solution. It is possible to have a complex value that has cosine equal to 1.5.
 
Could you also look at it this way? f(x)=2cox(x)+3 -- It's going to be translated? up 3 units and is only has an amplitude of 2 so it will never cross the x-axis, so there are not any x-intercepts.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top