I Solving Vanishing Tensor Eqn & Raising All Indices

George Keeling
Gold Member
Messages
180
Reaction score
41
TL;DR Summary
Problem with vanishing tensor equation with all indices down. Does it still vanish when they are up?
I have an equation $$
\chi_\nu\nabla_\mu\chi_\sigma+\chi_\sigma\nabla_\nu\chi_\mu+\chi_\mu\nabla_\sigma\chi_\nu=0
$$so we also have$$
g_{\nu\rho}g_{\mu\tau}g_{\sigma\lambda}\left(\chi^\rho\nabla^\tau\chi^\lambda+\chi^\lambda\nabla^\rho\chi^\tau+\chi^\tau\nabla^\lambda\chi^\rho\right)=0
$$Does that mean that$$
\chi^\rho\nabla^\tau\chi^\lambda+\chi^\lambda\nabla^\rho\chi^\tau+\chi^\tau\nabla^\lambda\chi^\rho=0
$$as well?

I can prove in two dimensions that $$
x_i=0\Rightarrow g_{ij}x^j=0\Rightarrow x^j=0
$$as long as the metric is not degenerate.

It would be horrendous to extend the proof to four dimensions and three indices. I think there is some more intuitive way to get from the second equation to the third, but the intuition eludes me.
 
  • Like
Likes kent davidge
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, actually it is true, the key point as you say is that ##g_{\mu\nu}## has an inverse, so instead of doing what you do in equation 2, why not contract the first equation with ##g^{\alpha\nu}g^{\beta\mu}g^{\gamma\sigma}##? What you get from there?

BTW, note that this is true only because ##D_{\alpha} g^{\mu\nu} = 0##, if this were not true then an expression true for covariant vectors wouldn't need to be true for contravariant ones.
 
  • Like
  • Wow
Likes George Keeling and vanhees71
George Keeling said:
Summary:: Problem with vanishing tensor equation with all indices down. Does it still vanish when they are up?

Raising all the indexes on the LHS of a vanishing tensor equation with all indices down obviously gives a vanishing tensor equation with all indices up (since "raising an index" on ##0## on the RHS just gives ##0## again). As @Gaussian97 says, this will work as long as the metric is not degenerate (so the inverse metric is well-defined).
 
Brilliant Gaussian, thanks.
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
Back
Top