Solving Wave Equation with Paraxial Approximation

Physics news on Phys.org
If U_0(r,z)=V(r,z)e^{ikz}, then:

\frac{\partial U_0}{\partial z}=\frac{\partial V}{\partial z}e^{ikz}+ikVe^{ikz}

due to the product rule.

so... \frac{\partial^2 U_0}{\partial z^2}=\ldots? :wink:
 
Oops, I see now I was looking past the obvious. I'll do the calculation in the morning. Is there a reason why they leave out the e^{ikz} from the final equation?

Thanks.

edit: V = V(r,z)e^{ikz}?
 
Last edited:
Confundo said:
Oops, I see now I was looking past the obvious. I'll do the calculation in the morning. Is there a reason why they leave out the e^{ikz} from the final equation?

They haven't "left it out"...To see what becomes of that term, work out the derivatives in equation (4) using the assumed form of U_0.


edit: V = V(r,z)e^{ikz}?

Huh?! :confused:...What are you trying to ask here?
 
Worked that out now, must learn not to try and do derivatives in my head while tired.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top