Solving Wavelength & Tone of Sound Waves

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the wavelength and speed of sound waves produced by a 1m string vibrating at 440 Hz, with the wavelength being 1 meter and speed calculated as 440 m/s. It also addresses the length of a Boomwhacker™ tube, which, when sounding the same tone at 440 Hz with a speed of sound in air at 330 m/s, would measure approximately 0.75 meters. Additionally, if one end of the Boomwhacker™ tube is capped, it would produce a different tone, typically a lower frequency. Participants suggest using physics resources and textbooks for formulas and further understanding. The conversation highlights the challenges of solving these problems without formal class support.
PhysicsJoe101
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
(a) First, consider a string of length 1m attached at both ends. It sounding a fundamental tone of 440 Hz. What is the wavelength of the above waves on the string? What is the speed of the waves on the string?

(b) Now consider a Boomwhacker™ tube open at both ends, sounding a tone of 440 Hz. Given that the speed of sound in air is 330 m/s, how long is the Boomwhacker™ tube?

(c) What tone would be produced by the Boomwhacker™ tube if one end was capped.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What you tried so far? You need to show some of your thoughts on solving the problem. What equations might be useful?
 
These questions are not FOR a class, they just are questions that came up when I was doing an experiment in Lab Class. I'm not sure what route to take in order to solve it. It would be easier, as would many problems, if I were taking an actual physics class that supplied me with the formulas necassary for solving this problem.:rolleyes:
 
These questions are not FOR a class, they just are questions that came up when I was doing an experiment in Lab Class.
Questions that "came up" from where? They are still part of coursework though, right?
Read http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/waves/string.html. Maybe that will help.

It would be easier, as would many problems, if I were taking an actual physics class that supplied me with the formulas necassary for solving this problem.
Try finding a book in the library to use as a reference.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top