Solving x^(2/3)=4: Logarithms or What?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mozart
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Logarithms
AI Thread Summary
To solve the equation x^(2/3) = 4, understanding fractional exponents as radicals is crucial. The denominator indicates the root, while the numerator indicates the power applied to x. The method discussed involves rewriting x^(2/3) as the cube root of x squared and equating it to 4. By taking the square root of 4, which is 2, and then cubing it, the value of x is determined to be 8. The approach used in the discussion confirms that the solution is correct and follows proper mathematical methods.
Mozart
Messages
106
Reaction score
0
:frown: I don't remember how to do this x^(2/3)=4 solve for x Do you use logarithm or something?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm going to try my best to explain. Whenever you have a fractional exponent, that is another way of talking about a radical...


The "3" in the denominator of the fraction is what "root" your radical will be:

Ex. square root of 2 = 21/2
cubed root of 2 = 21/3

now, the numerator is what power "X" is going to be:

Ex. square root of 21 = 21/2
cubed root of 22 = 22/3

That should hopefully get you started in the right direction...
 
After reading what you said I did the following.

wrote x^2 with the third root around it and made it equal 4.

I then took the square root of 4 to get rid of the square sign on x

I then cubed the 2 and got 8

After pugging the 8 into x^(2/3) I got 4

Please tell me I got the answer using a proper method and this isn't a cruel coincidence. Thanks by the way for the help!
 
Last edited:
Mozart said:
After reading what you said I did the following.
wrote x^2 with the third root around it and made it equal 4.
I then took the square root of 4 to get rid of the square sign on x
I then cubed the 2 and got 8
After pugging the 8 into x^(2/3) I got 4
Please tell me I got the answer using a proper method and this isn't a cruel coincidence. Thanks by the way for the help!

sounds like you did it right.
 
Thanks.
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Back
Top