Some basic questions about pressure

  • Thread starter Thread starter Vikram
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pressure
AI Thread Summary
Air pressure is determined by the weight of the air above a point, but air behaves as a fluid, allowing pressure to equalize rather than sharply drop when standing beneath an object. When a container is closed after being open to the atmosphere, the pressure inside remains equal to atmospheric pressure because the number of air molecules and their movement remain unchanged. The pressure inside the container is maintained by the continuous collisions of air molecules, which do not alter simply by closing the lid. Additionally, fluids exert equal pressure throughout their volume, ensuring consistent pressure distribution. Understanding these principles clarifies common misconceptions about air pressure dynamics.
Vikram
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I have some really basic questions regarding pressure. I hope they aren't too trivial. Here I go:

1) We know air pressure at a point develops because of the weight of all air present above that point. So when I stand beneath something, say a loft, now there's a very little air above me, so there should be a sharp fall in air pressure, but it doesn't happen. Why?

2) When we keep a container open in air, and then close it. We treat the pressure of air inside the container as equal to the atmospheric pressure. Why is that so?

Please help me as I have these really basic questions. Thanks! :)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Vikram said:
I have some really basic doubts regarding pressure. I hope they aren't too trivial. Here I go:
Just FYI, what you have are questions, not doubts. The two don't mean the same thing in English even though you have been taught that they do.

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=607274


1) We know air pressure at a point develops because of the weight of all air present above that point. So when I stand beneath something, say a loft, now there's a very little air above me, so there should be a sharp fall in air pressure, but it doesn't happen. Why?
You are forgetting that air is a fluid.

2) When we keep a container open in air, and then close it. We treat the pressure of air inside the container as equal to the atmospheric pressure. Why is that so?
Why would it not be so? Why would the pressure of that gas change just because you put a lid on the jar?

It is the same until you move the container further up or further down in the atmosphere, in which case it would be different because it stays the same but you would be moving it to somewhere that had a different pressure.
 
phinds said:
Just FYI, what you have are questions, not doubts. The two don't mean the same thing in English even though you have been taught that they do.

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=607274
You are forgetting that air is a fluid.Why would it not be so? Why would the pressure of that gas change just because you put a lid on the jar?

It is the same until you move the container further up or further down in the atmosphere, in which case it would be different because it stays the same but you would be moving it to somewhere that had a different pressure.

First of all, thanks for pointing out my mistake! I won't commit it again! (Question edited)
And secondly, can you please explain your points more elaborately? What does air being a fluid imply?
 
1) Let's say your hypothesis was correct and that there actually was "very little air" above you. And when you stand away from the so called "loft" the pressure is then higher. But high pressure will always move into areas of low pressure. Therefore, there can't be a fall in pressure just because you are standing underneath something. It will always equilibrate to be the same pressure everywhere until the weight of the gas/fluid above prevents the high pressure from moving upwards.

2) Atmospheric pressure is caused by the molecules of air moving around randomly and colliding with each other and with other objects at a given rate. It is these large number of collisions over a specific time interval which give the force that you feel. If you increase the number of molecules in a given volume then statistically there will be more collisions and therefore the pressure will increase as well. Since gravity is the main force acting on these moving molecules it will tend to attract more molecules to lower elevations until the pressure (collisions) builds up enough to equilibrate the push down from the weight of the molecules above.

When you close the container, all you have done is capture a fixed number of air molecules at a given pressure. They are still colliding with each other and with the container walls at a given rate. Nothing has really changed from when the container was opened and therefore the pressure is the same.
 
Vikram said:
First of all, thanks for pointing out my mistake! I won't commit it again! (Question edited)
And secondly, can you please explain your points more elaborately? What does air being a fluid imply?

paisiello2 has give a good explanation and I'll just add this: fluids exert equal pressure throughout the volume in which they are contained. Using your reasoning, a balloon wouldn't work because there would be no pressure on the top of the balloon, only on the bottom, but that's not how fluid pressure works.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top