Some quesitons about Sun and Earh

  • Thread starter Thread starter cshum00
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sun
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the forces that govern Earth's orbit around the Sun and its rotation. It clarifies that gravity is the sole force keeping Earth in orbit, eliminating the need for a tangential force, as described by Newton's laws. The Earth continues to spin due to conservation of momentum, with no additional force required to maintain its rotation. Participants also explore the concept of orbits, emphasizing that two bodies of equal mass orbit around their common center of gravity, while a larger mass, like the Sun, influences the orbit of a smaller body, such as Earth. The conversation concludes with an acknowledgment of the importance of understanding the center of gravity in these scenarios.
cshum00
Messages
215
Reaction score
0
1) What keeps the Earth orbiting around the Sun?
I know that gravity gives the force of the Earth towards the center of the Sun but what about the tangential force? What gives the Earth the tangential force?

2) What force makes the Earth spin?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1) There is no tangential force (assume the orbit to be circular), just the force of gravity. What makes you think there would be a tangential force? No such force is required for an object to orbit. Perhaps you should read up on Newton's cannon?

2) Similarly, there is no force. The Earth has always been spinning, and as a result of conservation of momentum, will continue spinning. You don't need a force to keep an object in a state of constant motion, which is Newton's 1st law.
 
Well i get the part about conservation of momentum now that make sense.

For the first question i guess i have to read about orbits. Is there any simple explanation of that? I can only image 2 bodies moving opposite x-directions but are located in different y-directions. And so when they cross paths, the gravity try to pull each other so gravity will play role of centrifugal force while their initial velocity will play roles of tangential velocity. But that is the case where the both masses are orbiting around empty space. How do i create the scenario for something orbiting around a mass?
 
There is only one scenario in what you just described...
 
cshum00 said:
Well i get the part about conservation of momentum now that make sense.

For the first question i guess i have to read about orbits. Is there any simple explanation of that? I can only image 2 bodies moving opposite x-directions but are located in different y-directions. And so when they cross paths, the gravity try to pull each other so gravity will play role of centrifugal force while their initial velocity will play roles of tangential velocity. But that is the case where the both masses are orbiting around empty space. How do i create the scenario for something orbiting around a mass?

Well, two bodies of equivalent mass will seem to orbit around space, but they're really orbiting around each other. The center of gravity of the combined bodies is exactly right between them (since they have equal mass).

As you begin to make one mass bigger, the center of mass moves towards it... until it's so huge that the center of mass (of the two bodies) is practically right in the center of the mass of the larger body.

An example of the last scenario (one extremely massive body and a not-somassive body) could be the Sun and any of the planets around it (say... Earth). So the center of gravity for both bodies (the Sun and the Earth) is right about where the center of gravity is for the Sun.

In reality, it's a little bit off from the Sun's center of gravity, so the sun does actually wobble a bit.
 
Now it makes sense. I forgot about adding the center of gravity situation. Thanks for clarifying everything for me.
 
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
14K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
25
Views
6K
Replies
40
Views
6K
Back
Top