Medical Some questions about action potentials

  • Thread starter Thread starter CausativeAgent
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Potentials
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the mechanisms of ion movement during neuronal action potentials, specifically focusing on potassium (K+) and chloride (Cl-) ions. It clarifies that the movement of K+ during repolarization is primarily influenced by its concentration gradient, despite the presence of an electrical gradient that might suggest a preference for depolarization. The concept of the electrochemical gradient is emphasized, which combines both concentration and electrical gradients to determine ion movement. The Nernst equation is mentioned as a tool for calculating the voltage across the membrane corresponding to a given concentration gradient. Additionally, the role of ion channels, particularly voltage-gated channels, is highlighted in shaping the action potential, with the understanding that the actual number of ions moving during an action potential is relatively small and does not significantly alter overall ion concentrations. The discussion also touches on the complexities of conductance types and their impact on ion flow.
CausativeAgent
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
My question arises from study during my Human A+P class, but it goes beyond what I'd be expected to know for the class so I decided to post it here.

When potassium exits the cell body during repolarization, is this due to its concentration gradient? If so, why does the chemical gradient get "preference" in deciding the direction of K+ movement, as opposed to the electrical gradient, which I would think would favor depolorization, ie. moving the absolute value of the charge closer to zero. I have a similar confusion about the movement of chloride ions into the cell during hyperpolarization.


Thanks for reading.
 
Biology news on Phys.org
For these kinds of questions, you typically talk about a combined "electrochemical gradient" rather than thinking about the concentration and voltage gradients separately. The Nernst equation (or similar results) can be used to calculate the corresponding voltage across the membrane for a given concentration gradient.

Ions enter and leave the cell as their driving forces with respect to this electrochemical gradient dictate. The particular shape of the action potential is due to the properties of the different ion channels involved...
 
just to add to Cincinnatus response, you can look at the instantaneous driving force on any ion as the difference between the Nernst eqn and the transmembrane voltage. But that in itself may not tell you much about current flow of any species.

Its becaause conductances (the reciprocal of resistance)come in two types, there is a passive component which is more or less constant, and as Cinci offered, conductances that vary as both a function of time and voltage thru various voltage gated channels. generally these will account for the shapes of an AP, but which will also certainly change depending on concentration gradients. If you look at the actual number of ions that change sides during an AP it is a relatively small number and unlikely to affect the overall concentrations.
 
Last edited:
That equation is a bit past my level of comprehension at this point, but it's nice to at least know the factors involved.
 
CausativeAgent said:
That equation is a bit past my level of comprehension at this point, but it's nice to at least know the factors involved.

Hey you're thinking about it, and the nernst eqn is fairly easy to derive at least for one ion, basically by saying the electrical driving force exactly offsets a concentration gradient at a particular voltage, ie when diffusion/entropy considerations are exactly offset by voltage potential gain moving against that same concentration gradient.
 
Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S. According to articles in the Los Angeles Times, "Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S.", and "Kissing bugs bring deadly disease to California". LA Times requires a subscription. Related article -...
I am reading Nicholas Wade's book A Troublesome Inheritance. Please let's not make this thread a critique about the merits or demerits of the book. This thread is my attempt to understanding the evidence that Natural Selection in the human genome was recent and regional. On Page 103 of A Troublesome Inheritance, Wade writes the following: "The regional nature of selection was first made evident in a genomewide scan undertaken by Jonathan Pritchard, a population geneticist at the...
Back
Top