Some questions about naming conventions for ethers

  • Thread starter Thread starter espen180
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on naming conventions for cyclic ethers, highlighting the distinction between trivial names and IUPAC nomenclature. Ethylene oxide (C2O) and tetrahydrofuran (C4O) are identified as trivial names. The conversation suggests a systematic approach to naming cyclic ethers, such as using "1,3,5-trioxycyclohexane" for a cyclic structure with three oxygen and three carbon atoms. Additionally, it notes that in compound naming, the counting starts from the oxygen atom closest to the bond, exemplified by "2,3-benzo-1,3-dioxycycloheptane." The participants seek confirmation and further rules related to these naming conventions, emphasizing the importance of IUPAC names over trivial ones.
espen180
Messages
831
Reaction score
2
First, I am wondering about naming conventions for cyclic ethers.

I have found
C_2O : Ethylene oxide
C_4O : Tetrahydrofuran

But (I think) these are trivial names.

I think I found a system where for example a cycle of three O-atoms and three C-atoms in C-O-C-O... fashion becomes 1,3,5-trioxycyclohexane.

Also, in compounds, we count from the O-atom closest to the bond between the compounds, like in 2,3-benzo-1,3-dioxycycloheptane?

Can anyone confirm this, eventually contribute additional useful rules related to this?

Thanks in advance.
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Names like THF are like calling H2O water instead of hydrogen hydroxide (pretty much). These aren't IUPAC names, so you're right, they're trivial. I'm not great with cyclical naming, so I'll leave the second part to someone who's a little more experienced in organic chemistry.
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
11K
Replies
7
Views
11K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Back
Top