Someone please explain this physics concept

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the behavior of a magnet dropped through a non-magnetized aluminum pole, which significantly slows its descent compared to a marker. Participants explore the physics behind this phenomenon, suggesting that the magnet may induce a magnetic field within the pole, affecting its fall. The difference in behavior when the magnet is stationary versus in motion is also highlighted, prompting further inquiry into magnetic braking effects. Suggestions to research magnetic brakes are offered as a way to deepen understanding. The conversation emphasizes the importance of exploring the underlying principles of magnetism and motion.
eddy10188
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
My teacher had a long metal pole (I believe it was aluminum) and said that it was NOT magnetized. He put a magnet up to the side of the pole and it did not stick, and he dropped a marker through the top of the pole and the marker came out the bottom at a normal rate. However, when he took a magnet and dropped it through the top of the pole, it took a long time for it to come out, maybe 10 seconds. Then it just slipped out the bottom.

Some one please explain this phenomenon, thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to the PF.

Sounds like this may be part of your assignment, to figure out why there is a difference. What are your thoughts? Why would there be a difference between holding the magnet stationary against the non-ferrous metal, versus sliding it along next to the metal?
 
berkeman said:
Welcome to the PF.

Sounds like this may be part of your assignment, to figure out why there is a difference. What are your thoughts? Why would there be a difference between holding the magnet stationary against the non-ferrous metal, versus sliding it along next to the metal?

Oh sorry I should have explained..

The only thing I can really think of is that it that the magnet might be trying to set up a magnetic field inside of the pole. It also could be that the pole has a much smaller area for the magnet to go through so it is experiencing the effects of its own field but then again I am not sure that is true..
 
eddy10188 said:
Oh sorry I should have explained..

The only thing I can really think of is that it that the magnet might be trying to set up a magnetic field inside of the pole. It also could be that the pole has a much smaller area for the magnet to go through so it is experiencing the effects of its own field but then again I am not sure that is true..

Boy, it's hard to give a hint on this question without giving the answer away.

I'll try this, but it may still be too much. Use Google or Wikipedia.org to learn how magnetic brakes work...
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top