Sound Intensity on a Field (no interference)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the sound intensity level at a point one-quarter of the way from one speaker to another in a field with two loudspeakers. The intensity at the halfway point is given as 74.1 dB, which translates to a sound intensity of 2.57e-5 W/m². Each speaker contributes half of this intensity, resulting in 1.28e-5 W/m² at the halfway point. Participants confirm the approach of using the established intensity values and the provided equation to find the intensity at the quarter distance. The conversation emphasizes the importance of applying the correct formulas without interference or sound loss.
Ethan_Tab
Messages
57
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


Two loudspeakers on elevated platforms are at opposite ends of a field. Each broadcasts equally in all directions. At the halfway point, the intensity is 74.1dB.

What is the sound intensity level at a point one-quarter of the way from one speaker to the other along the line joining them?

Assume no interference and sound loss.

Homework Equations


Ia/Ib=rb2/ra2

The Attempt at a Solution


I've started by finding the sound intensity at the half way point in W/m^2

107.41=Ia/10-12
Therfore: Ia= 2.57e-5 w/m^2
Since this is the net sum of the two speakers each one only provides half of that therefore just before they combine, the Sound intensity at the half way point relative to each speaker is
1.28e-5 W/m^2

Do I just use this information to figure out Ib at 1/4th the distance with the equation I wrote down in Part 2?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ethan_Tab said:
I've started by finding the sound intensity at the half way point in W/m^2

107.41=Ia/10-12
Therfore: Ia= 2.57e-5 w/m^2
Since this is the net sum of the two speakers each one only provides half of that therefore just before they combine, the Sound intensity at the half way point relative to each speaker is
1.28e-5 W/m^2

OK

Do I just use this information to figure out Ib at 1/4th the distance with the equation I wrote down in Part 2?

Sounds good.
 
Cool, thanks for the help @TSny
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top